# MADE: Beyond Scoring via a Multilingual Agentic Diagnosing Engine for Fine-Grained Evaluation Insights

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07020 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.07020/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 17 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Medical and scientific domain agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/medical-and-scientific-domain-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03193/) (2021)
- [Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03057/) (2022)
- [Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14478/) (2021)
- [The Belebele Benchmark: a Parallel Reading Comprehension Dataset in 122 Language Variants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.16884/) (2023)
- [BLEnD: A Benchmark for LLMs on Everyday Knowledge in Diverse Cultures and Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09948/) (2024)
- [INCLUDE: Evaluating Multilingual Language Understanding with Regional Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.19799/) (2024)
- [LLMs Beyond English: Scaling the Multilingual Capability of LLMs with Cross-Lingual Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01771/) (2024)
- [Multilingual != Multicultural: Evaluating Gaps Between Multilingual Capabilities and Cultural Alignment in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.16534/) (2025)
- [Preliminary WMT24 Ranking of General MT Systems and LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19884/) (2024)
- [CultureScope: A Dimensional Lens for Probing Cultural Understanding in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16188/) (2025)
- [The AI Language Proficiency Monitor -- Tracking the Progress of LLMs on Multilingual Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08538/) (2025)
- [Do Large Language Models Truly Understand Cross-cultural Differences?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.07075/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [M-SQE: Multilingual Skill Quality Estimation for Enhancing Language Equality in Agentic Skill Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.18445/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multilingual and multicultural benchmarks now cover dozens of languages and model families, but the resulting score landscapes remain metric-rich and insight-poor, necessitating fine-grained multilingual post-evaluation diagnosis. However, single LLMs and open-ended agents are easily swamped by the long, noisy diagnostic input, and no reusable taxonomy exists for it. To address this, we propose MADE, a Multilingual Agentic Diagnosing Engine that decomposes post-evaluation analysis into planning, aggregate analysis, instance-level case inspection, multilingual and cultural reflection, and grounded report synthesis. MADE is paired with an expert-led 54-query and 15-language diagnostic set, evaluated on top of a large-scale multilingual evaluation substrate (33 model families, 11 benchmarks, 26 languages, 34 cultures, 8.66M evaluation records). Experiments show that MADE outperforms the strongest shared baseline by 47% in diagnosis report quality and is preferred by human multilingual experts in 87.9% of pairwise comparisons. Applied with multilingual experts, MADE further surfaces four actionable findings on deployment, iteration, and cross-cultural pitfalls, turning benchmark score tables into model-selection and remediation guidance.