# Conformal Risk Sharing: Certified Cost Allocation with Participation Guarantees

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06391 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.06391/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Conformalized Quantile Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.03222/) (2019)
- [Conformal Risk Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.02814/) (2022)
- [Distribution-Free, Risk-Controlling Prediction Sets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.02703/) (2021)
- [Exact and Robust Conformal Inference Methods for Predictive Machine Learning With Dependent Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.06300/) (2018)
- [Conformal Decision Theory: Safe Autonomous Decisions from Imperfect Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05921/) (2023)
- [Conformal Uncertainty Sets for Robust Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14957/) (2021)
- [End-to-End Conformal Calibration for Optimization Under Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.20534/) (2024)
- [Conformal Risk Training: End-to-End Optimization of Conformal Risk Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08748/) (2025)
- [Conformal Prediction for Stochastic Decision-Making of PV Power in Electricity Markets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20149/) (2024)
- [Post-selection Inference for Conformal Prediction: Trading off Coverage for Precision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06158/) (2023)
- [Valid Selection among Conformal Sets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.20173/) (2025)
- [Conformal Robust Control of Linear Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16250/) (2024)
- [Collaborative Insurance Sustainability and Network Structure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.02764/) (2021)
- [Linear Risk Sharing on Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21411/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Sharing the financial impact of rare adverse events across a group can soften extreme individual burdens, but any participant made worse off by the arrangement has reason to leave. A credible mechanism must therefore provide each agent with a trustworthy cap on their future obligation and should be deployed only if the aggregate harm across participants is bounded. We formalise this as the Certified Allocation Problem: from finite data and without distributional assumptions, find a redistribution rule, produce obligation caps for every participant, and verify that no participant is made materially worse off. We propose Conformal Risk Sharing, which solves this problem by pairing an interpretable sharing policy with split conformal calibration. The sharing intensity is tuned on training data, while held-out calibration data produces distribution-free per-agent guarantees (valid under exchangeability). Experiments on synthetic and real-world data, including precipitation and energy-cooperative data, confirm that the framework can substantially reduce extreme obligations for high-risk agents while controlling harm to others.
