# A Framework for Measuring Appropriate Reliance on Set-Valued AI Advice

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06081 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.06081/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Conformalized Quantile Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.03222/) (2019)
- [Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14779/) (2020)
- [Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.09451/) (2019)
- [Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.07586/) (2020)
- [Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06823/) (2022)
- [Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice: Conceptualization and the Effect of Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02187/) (2023)
- [Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.07938/) (2020)
- [In Search of Verifiability: Explanations Rarely Enable Complementary Performance in AI-Advised Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07722/) (2023)
- [The Flaws of Policies Requiring Human Oversight of Government Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05067/) (2021)
- [Knowing About Knowing: An Illusion of Human Competence Can Hinder Appropriate Reliance on AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11333/) (2023)
- [Conformal Prediction Sets Improve Human Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13744/) (2024)
- [On the Quest for Effectiveness in Human Oversight: Interdisciplinary Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04059/) (2024)
- [Explanations, Fairness, and Appropriate Reliance in Human-AI Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11812/) (2022)
- [Evaluating the Utility of Conformal Prediction Sets for AI-Advised Image Labeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08876/) (2024)
- [AI Reliance and Decision Quality: Fundamentals, Interdependence, and the Effects of Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08804/) (2023)
- [To Err Is AI! Debugging as an Intervention to Facilitate Appropriate Reliance on AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14377/) (2024)
- [Automation Bias in the AI Act: On the Legal Implications of Attempting to De-Bias Human Oversight of AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10036/) (2025)
- [A Survey of AI Reliance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03948/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Autonomous Research Agents: A Survey of AI Scientists and the Verification Gap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05179/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Appropriate reliance on AI advice has become a central research theme in human-AI collaboration. Existing frameworks have focused exclusively on point predictions as AI advice. However, set-valued AI advice (e.g., discrete sets or continuous intervals) is increasingly being used to communicate uncertainty and improve human decision making. In this paper, we develop the first formal framework for measuring appropriate reliance on set-valued AI advice within the sequential judge-advisor paradigm, spanning both classification and regression tasks. For classification, we first introduce the dimensions that are necessary for evaluating set-valued AI advice. We then define two metrics: correct reliance rate on AI and correct reliance rate on self, which jointly characterize appropriate reliance in this setting. For regression, we introduce quantity of AI reliance and quality of AI reliance, which respectively measure whether a decision maker utilized the AI advice and whether their reliance helped them get closer to the ground truth relative to their initial estimate. Through the application of our framework, we demonstrate how these metrics capture important nuances in human-AI collaboration that existing measures overlook.