# Beyond Absolute Scores: Relative Edit-induced Difference for Generalizable Image Aesthetic Assessment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05778 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.05778/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 33 of its 59 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08402/) (2022)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [InstructPix2Pix: Learning to Follow Image Editing Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09800/) (2022)
- [MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.05997/) (2021)
- [Qwen-Image Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02324/) (2025)
- [FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15742/) (2025)
- [OpenAI GPT-5 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03267/) (2025)
- [MagicBrush: A Manually Annotated Dataset for Instruction-Guided Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10012/) (2023)
- [Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17090/) (2023)
- [NIMA: Neural Image Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.05424/) (2017)
- [Seed1.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.07062/) (2025)
- [UltraEdit: Instruction-based Fine-Grained Image Editing at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.05282/) (2024)
- [Seedream 4.0: Toward Next-generation Multimodal Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20427/) (2025)
- [VIEScore: Towards Explainable Metrics for Conditional Image Synthesis Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14867/) (2023)
- [Q-Instruct: Improving Low-level Visual Abilities for Multi-modality Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06783/) (2023)
- [RankIQA: Learning from Rankings for No-reference Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.08347/) (2017)
- [Photo Aesthetics Ranking Network with Attributes and Content Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.01621/) (2016)
- [LongCat-Image Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.07584/) (2025)
- [Q-Insight: Understanding Image Quality via Visual Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22679/) (2025)
- [VisualQuality-R1: Reasoning-Induced Image Quality Assessment via Reinforcement Learning to Rank](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14460/) (2025)
- [Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment with Rich Attributes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.16754/) (2022)
- [AesExpert: Towards Multi-modality Foundation Model for Image Aesthetics Perception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09624/) (2024)
- [UNIAA: A Unified Multi-modal Image Aesthetic Assessment Baseline and Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09619/) (2024)
- [ArtiMuse: Fine-Grained Image Aesthetics Assessment with Joint Scoring and Expert-Level Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14533/) (2025)
- [UniPercept: Towards Unified Perceptual-Level Image Understanding across Aesthetics, Quality, Structure, and Texture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.21675/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional Image Aesthetic Assessment (IAA) methods mainly rely on regressing absolute Mean Opinion Scores (MOS). However, such a paradigm overlooks the inherently dynamic nature of human aesthetic perception, which relies on subconscious comparison against implicit visual references. Consequently, the lack of causal reasoning regarding aesthetic differences prevents models from learning generalizable aesthetic principles, thus limiting their generalization across diverse scenarios. In this work, we rethink the IAA task and propose Relative Edit-induced Difference Aesthetic learning (RED-Aes), a novel framework that leverages controllable image editing models to simulate the human aesthetic reasoning process. Instead of fitting absolute score distributions, RED-Aes explicitly learns the visual factors that drive aesthetic changes. To support this paradigm, we construct the RED-20k dataset, which comprises editing-based image pairs, quantitative aesthetic differences, and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. Furthermore, we introduce a three-stage training strategy guided by a relative ranking consistency reward, optimizing the model solely via relative supervision. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RED-Aes achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple public benchmarks, exhibiting superior generalization capabilities.