# Seeing Time: Benchmarking Chronological Reasoning and Shortcut Biases in Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05702 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.05702/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 10 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Video understanding with MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/video-understanding-with-mllms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01006/) (2025)
- [MiniCPM-V 4.5: Cooking Efficient MLLMs via Architecture, Data, and Training Recipe](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18154/) (2025)
- [Benchmarking and Improving Detail Image Caption](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19092/) (2024)
- [LEGO-Puzzles: How Good Are MLLMs at Multi-Step Spatial Reasoning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19990/) (2025)
- [CapArena: Benchmarking and Analyzing Detailed Image Captioning in the LLM Era](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.12329/) (2025)
- [Can Multimodal LLMs do Visual Temporal Understanding and Reasoning? The answer is No!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.10674/) (2025)
- [CompareBench: A Benchmark for Visual Comparison Reasoning in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22737/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have significantly enhanced their ability to interpret complex visual semantics, yet their capacity for chronological reasoning remains under-explored. In this paper, we introduce a novel benchmark specifically designed to evaluate how VLMs perceive and reason about chronological information within and across images. Unlike existing video-based benchmarks that focus on frame sequencing, our work delves into the underlying logic of chronological judgment and the expansion toward multimodal integration. To facilitate this, we construct three specialized datasets: one containing visually similar objects spanning long historical durations, another categorized by diverse event and object types, and a third pairing images with time-sensitive news text for cross-modal alignment. Through extensive experiments, we analyze whether models exhibit performance disparities across categories and, crucially, explore whether they rely on ``incorrect shortcuts'', such as image color rather than genuine chronological features. Our results reveal that while VLMs show promise, they frequently exploit superficial cues like grayscale versus color filters to bypass authentic chronological reasoning. By providing these high-quality datasets and a rigorous evaluation framework, we offer a diagnostic tool to identify current limitations and guide the development of more robust, logically grounded multimodal models. The source code is shown in https://github.com/LuoRenqiang/ChronoVision.