# UltraVR: A Diagnostic Ultra-Resolution Image-VQA Benchmark for Evidence-Grounded Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05576 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.05576/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 16 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10302/) (2024)
- [GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01006/) (2025)
- [Kimi-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07491/) (2025)
- [MiniCPM-V 4.5: Cooking Efficient MLLMs via Architecture, Data, and Training Recipe](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18154/) (2025)
- [Divide, Conquer and Combine: A Training-Free Framework for High-Resolution Image Perception in Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15556/) (2024)
- [ReasonMap: Towards Fine-Grained Visual Reasoning from Transit Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18675/) (2025)
- [When Visualizing is the First Step to Reasoning: MIRA, a Benchmark for Visual Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.02779/) (2025)
- [QuantiPhy: A Quantitative Benchmark Evaluating Physical Reasoning Abilities of Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.19526/) (2025)
- [A Benchmark for Ultra-High-Resolution Remote Sensing MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.17319/) (2025)
- [Phi-4-reasoning-vision-15B Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03975/) (2026)
- [Pix2Fact: When Vision Is Not Enough -- Benchmarking Fine-Grained VQA with Web Verification on High-Resolution Real-World Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00593/) (2026)
- [UR-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Hop Reasoning over Ultra-High-Resolution Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08748/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) excel on visual question answering and multimodal reasoning benchmarks. Yet their capability on ultra-resolution images - where critical evidence is tiny, subtle, spatially distant, or distributed - remains unclear. Existing evaluations largely report final-answer accuracy, offering limited insight into whether models acquire and integrate the necessary visual evidence. We introduce UltraVR, a diagnostic benchmark for evidence-grounded visual reasoning over ultra-resolution images. UltraVR spans four high-value scenarios: CCTV surveillance, remote sensing (RS), whole-slide image (WSI) pathology, and industrial anomaly detection (AD). These domains pose complementary challenges: fine-grained object grounding in crowded CCTV scenes, long-range spatial comparison in RS, multi-scale evidence navigation in WSI, and subtle irregularity detection in repetitive industrial layouts. Beyond standard QA triples, each instance includes a structured ground-truth chain of thought with step-level questions, intermediate answers, and reasoning labels. These labels decompose reasoning into evidence grounding, local perception, quantification, evidence integration, and decision inference, enabling process-level diagnosis over black-box scoring. Using UltraVR, we evaluate frontier VLMs and show that current models remain far from reliable on ultra-resolution reasoning. Importantly, the structured annotations allow us to localize failures across the visual-to-decision pipeline: errors concentrate in evidence grounding and local perception, while downstream inference often recovers when intermediate visual facts are supplied. These findings demonstrate UltraVR as a diagnostic testbed for measuring not only whether VLMs answer correctly, but where their ultra-resolution reasoning process breaks.