# Gradient Descent with Large Step Size Restores Symmetry in Deep Linear Networks with Multi-Pathway

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05219 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.05219/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.03635/) (2018)
- [Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.03530/) (2016)
- [Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6120/) (2013)
- [The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10345/) (2017)
- [Exploring Generalization in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.08947/) (2017)
- [Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00065/) (2021)
- [Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13655/) (2019)
- [Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.09280/) (2017)
- [On the Optimization of Deep Networks: Implicit Acceleration by Overparameterization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.06509/) (2018)
- [The large learning rate phase of deep learning: the catapult mechanism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.02218/) (2020)
- [A mathematical theory of semantic development in deep neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.10531/) (2018)
- [Self-Stabilization: The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent at the Edge of Stability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15594/) (2022)
- [Implicit Regularization of Discrete Gradient Dynamics in Linear Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.13262/) (2019)
- [An analytic theory of generalization dynamics and transfer learning in deep linear networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.10374/) (2018)
- [Understanding Optimization in Deep Learning with Central Flows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24206/) (2024)
- [Gradient Descent for Deep Matrix Factorization: Dynamics and Implicit Bias towards Low Rank](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13772/) (2020)
- [The Neural Race Reduction: Dynamics of Abstraction in Gated Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.10430/) (2022)
- [(S)GD over Diagonal Linear Networks: Implicit Regularisation, Large Stepsizes and Edge of Stability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08982/) (2023)
- [Catapults in SGD: spikes in the training loss and their impact on generalization through feature learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04815/) (2023)
- [Deep linear networks for regression are implicitly regularized towards flat minima](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13456/) (2024)
- [Position: Solve Layerwise Linear Models First to Understand Neural Dynamical Phenomena (Neural Collapse, Emergence, Lazy/Rich Regime, and Grokking)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.21009/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent analyses of multi-pathway Deep Linear Networks use Gradient Flow to predict a "winner-takes-all" specialization in which path symmetry breaks and each feature concentrates in a single pathway. In this work, we show that discrete Gradient Descent (GD) with a large step size tells a different story. We prove that single-path solutions are sharp minima, whereas distributing signals across pathways reduces sharpness by a factor that decreases with both the number of pathways and depth. Consequently, while early training reproduces the depth-driven symmetry breaking predicted by GF, oscillations at the Edge of Stability subsequently override this tendency and drive the network into a re-balancing phase, where signals redistribute across pathways. Together, these results clarify how depth shapes pathway competition and explain why large-step GD favors shared representations rather than persistent single-pathway dominance.