# Evaluating Reasoning Fidelity in Visual Text Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04479 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.04479/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 45 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 45)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01952/) (2023)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Pointer Sentinel Mixture Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.07843/) (2016)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02255/) (2023)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14858/) (2022)
- [Qwen-Image Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02324/) (2025)
- [DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.00161/) (2019)
- [TextDiffuser: Diffusion Models as Text Painters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10855/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-OCR: Contexts Optical Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.18234/) (2025)
- [HALC: Object Hallucination Reduction via Adaptive Focal-Contrast Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00425/) (2024)
- [AnyText: Multilingual Visual Text Generation And Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03054/) (2023)
- [TextDiffuser-2: Unleashing the Power of Language Models for Text Rendering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16465/) (2023)
- [GlyphControl: Glyph Conditional Control for Visual Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18259/) (2023)
- [GoT: Unleashing Reasoning Capability of Multimodal Large Language Model for Visual Generation and Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10639/) (2025)
- [Character-Aware Models Improve Visual Text Rendering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10562/) (2022)
- [PPTAgent: Generating and Evaluating Presentations Beyond Text-to-Slides](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.03936/) (2025)
- [Glyph-ByT5: A Customized Text Encoder for Accurate Visual Text Rendering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09622/) (2024)
- [AnyText2: Visual Text Generation and Editing With Customizable Attributes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15245/) (2024)
- [Glyph-ByT5-v2: A Strong Aesthetic Baseline for Accurate Multilingual Visual Text Rendering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10208/) (2024)
- [DesignDiffusion: High-Quality Text-to-Design Image Generation with Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01645/) (2025)
- [TextAtlas5M: A Large-scale Dataset for Dense Text Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.07870/) (2025)
- [Visual Text Generation in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14138/) (2024)
- [Diffusion-based Document Layout Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.10787/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent text-to-image (T2I) models can render highly legible and well-structured text within images, enabling applications including document generation and slide generation. However, it remains unclear whether such systems faithfully preserve reasoning ability when complex solutions must be expressed directly through rendered text, or whether they merely imitate surface-level patterns. We investigate this question by evaluating reasoning fidelity in visual text generation, where models must express complete reasoning processes as images. Our evaluation includes long text rendering, factual knowledge probing, context understanding, and multi-step reasoning. Across these settings, we find that current T2I models frequently produce semantic errors, logical inconsistencies, and incorrect intermediate steps, even when the rendered text appears visually clear. These failures contrast with the strong reasoning performance of text-only models on the same tasks. Our findings reveal a substantial gap between visual text generation and procedural reasoning, motivating more reliable visual text reasoning.