# Beyond Compression: Quantifying Spectral Accessibility in Vision Representations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03795 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03795/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 14 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12231/) (2018)
- [Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01644/) (2016)
- [Vision Transformers Need Registers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16588/) (2023)
- [Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.08810/) (2021)
- [Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.10497/) (2021)
- [Early Convolutions Help Transformers See Better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.14881/) (2021)
- [High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13545/) (2019)
- [A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08988/) (2019)
- [Anti-Oversmoothing in Deep Vision Transformers via the Fourier Domain Analysis: From Theory to Practice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05962/) (2022)
- [On the Frequency Bias of Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02447/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [HAFI-VLM: A Frequency Perspective for Diagnosing and Enhancing Visual Perception in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.02124/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models map visual features into a shared embedding space through learned projection layers, yet it remains unclear how these transformations alter the structure of visual information. This study examines changes in representation through spatial-frequency accessibility, measured by the linear recoverability of band-limited Fourier energy from model representations. To isolate effects beyond dimensionality reduction, we introduce Residual Spectral Loss (RSL), which evaluates changes relative to a dimension-matched random projection baseline. To reduce confounding effects from optimization, the analysis uses pretrained models with all parameters frozen. The experimental results show consistent frequency-dependent changes in accessibility across CLIP and DINOv2 on ImageNet and MS-COCO datasets. Spectral accessibility follows a non-monotonic trajectory across depth, peaking at intermediate layers before decreasing toward the output representation. The final transformation differs across architectures: CLIP's learned projection is spectrally neutral, with changes explained by compression, whereas DINOv2's [CLS] pooling induces a structured loss across the spectrum. These findings identify intermediate layers and pooling mechanisms as primary drivers of spectral transformation in modern vision encoders.