# Forgetting is Not Erasure: Recovering Latent Knowledge via Transport Keys

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02860 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.02860/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00796/) (2016)
- [Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.00751/) (2019)
- [iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.07725/) (2016)
- [Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.08840/) (2017)
- [Progressive Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.04671/) (2016)
- [Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forget](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.09601/) (2017)
- [Experience Replay for Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.11682/) (2018)
- [Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.00420/) (2018)
- [PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.05769/) (2017)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Application](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00487/) (2023)
- [Git Re-Basin: Merging Models modulo Permutation Symmetries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.04836/) (2022)
- [The Role of Permutation Invariance in Linear Mode Connectivity of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06296/) (2021)
- [Understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.5908/) (2014)
- [Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07682/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Catastrophic forgetting is often framed as a representational problem: after sequential training, a model appears to lose the features that supported performance on earlier tasks. We challenge the stronger form of this view. Across controlled continual-learning settings, we find that a significant portion of apparent forgetting can be attributed to interface drift between internal stages rather than permanent erasure of task-relevant computation. We study this phenomenon through a stitched evaluation protocol that combines early computation from a post-update network with late computation from its predecessor, optionally mediated by a compact, task-specific transport key. We describe transport keys at a systems level as compact interface-alignment operators estimated from a small set of paired anchor activations and evaluated through model stitching. On split CIFAR-100 with a ResNet-style network, transport keys recover most of the original Task A performance after sequential training on Task B. On a compact vision transformer, we observe a similar recovery pattern. These results suggest that continual learning may require better mechanisms for indexing and re-accessing latent computations, not only methods that prevent weight change.