# Automated Report-Derived Oncology VQA Benchmark for Evaluating Vision-Language Models on 3D Medical Imaging

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02809 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.02809/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Medical vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 8 of its 13 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Medical vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/medical-vision-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [LLaVA-Med: Training a Large Language-and-Vision Assistant for Biomedicine in One Day](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00890/) (2023)
- [PathVQA: 30000+ Questions for Medical Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.10286/) (2020)
- [SLAKE: A Semantically-Labeled Knowledge-Enhanced Dataset for Medical Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09542/) (2021)
- [MedGemma Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05201/) (2025)
- [PMC-VQA: Visual Instruction Tuning for Medical Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10415/) (2023)
- [Towards Generalist Biomedical AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14334/) (2023)
- [OmniMedVQA: A New Large-Scale Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Medical LVLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09181/) (2024)
- [MIRAGE: The Illusion of Visual Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.21687/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Volumetric Radiology AI in the Era of Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20549/) (2026)
- [MedBenchAgent: Towards Systematic Automation of Medical VLM Benchmark Construction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.11312/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating vision-language models (VLMs) on medical images requires benchmarks that are clinically grounded, scalable, and controlled for evaluation confounds. Existing public benchmarks are limited in scale, manually annotated, or potentially leaked into VLM pretraining corpora. We present an automated agent-driven pipeline that generates multiple-choice VQA datasets directly from paired private radiology reports and 3D oncology imaging, producing two complementary question types: RADS-style questions deterministically derived from clinician-defined reporting schemas, and radiology report-derived questions generated by an LLM from radiologist findings and verified against the source report. Applied to four in-house cancer cohorts, the pipeline yields an instance-contamination-controlled benchmark without per-question human annotation. Zero-shot evaluation of six VLMs reveals no dominant model and substantial headroom across all cells. A blind ablation reveals that visual reliance is highly dataset-specific: liver Report-derived questions genuinely require the image, while Lung CT is essentially solvable without it - the leading closed model exceeds its sighted accuracy on Lung CT when blinded - indicating that even private clinical data does not guarantee a contamination-controlled read of visual capability. The pipeline is released as an open agent skill for in-house redeployment.