# HERO'S JOURNEY: Testing Complex Rule Induction with Text Games

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02556 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.02556/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12837/) (2022)
- [Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04618/) (2025)
- [TextWorld: A Learning Environment for Text-based Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.11532/) (2018)
- [Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.09713/) (2019)
- [COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05465/) (2020)
- [BabyAI: A Platform to Study the Sample Efficiency of Grounded Language Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.08272/) (2018)
- [Interactive Fiction Games: A Colossal Adventure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.05398/) (2019)
- [Towards End-to-End Automation of AI Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.15497/) (2026)
- [A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.05161/) (2020)
- [Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08559/) (2023)
- [ACRE: Abstract Causal REasoning Beyond Covariation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14232/) (2021)
- [IDEA: Enhancing the Rule Learning Ability of Large Language Model Agent through Induction, Deduction, and Abduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.10455/) (2024)
- [MIRAGE: Evaluating and Explaining Inductive Reasoning Process in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09542/) (2024)
- [Generating Diverse Hypotheses for Inductive Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13422/) (2024)
- [On Language Models' Sensitivity to Suspicious Coincidences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09387/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [ServeLearnBench: How Well Can Agents Self-Improve from Serving Experience?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.07792/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce HERO'S JOURNEY, a benchmark for rule induction in goal-directed episodic tasks, where agents must infer hidden rules from demonstrations and act on them through multi-step execution. HERO'S JOURNEY covers eight tasks across attribute and procedural induction families, each with four structural rule forms, controllable lexical grounding, and identifiability conditions. Evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs, we find that models show evidence of rule induction, but the ability is limited and uneven across tasks. Meanwhile, process execution adds an execution bottleneck for models, whereas surface semantics has minimal effect. Induction-specific steering methods improve performance on attribute tasks but show no reliable gains on procedural tasks, suggesting the gap in procedural induction remains an open challenge.
