# eMoT: evolving Memory-of-Thought via Symbolic Anchoring and Memory Corrosion

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02054 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.02054/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 32 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/prompting-and-chain-of-thought-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14858/) (2022)
- [Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11446/) (2021)
- [Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04388/) (2023)
- [Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12588/) (2022)
- [Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00114/) (2021)
- [Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09687/) (2023)
- [Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07191/) (2021)
- [CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11738/) (2023)
- [PAL: Program-aided Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10435/) (2022)
- [Neural Turing Machines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1410.5401/) (2014)
- [ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08128/) (2023)
- [Reasoning on Graphs: Faithful and Interpretable Large Language Model Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01061/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11495/) (2023)
- [A Diverse Corpus for Evaluating and Developing English Math Word Problem Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.15772/) (2021)
- [Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13379/) (2023)
- [RobustFill: Neural Program Learning under Noisy I/O](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.07469/) (2017)
- [Buffer of Thoughts: Thought-Augmented Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04271/) (2024)
- [Beyond Chain-of-Thought: A Survey of Chain-of-X Paradigms for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15676/) (2024)
- [Complex Logical Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01157/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve impressive performance on multi-step reasoning tasks, their reliability is persistently hindered by critical limitations such as unconstrained hallucinations and poor numerical computation. Fundamentally, these issues arise because standard models treat reasoning as a transient, one-off generation process rather than retaining and refining successful procedural logic. To address these challenges, we propose eMoT (evolving Memory-of-Thought), a unified framework that stabilizes multi-step reasoning by treating reasoning trajectories as dynamic, evolving memories rather than static templates. The framework primarily consists of three interconnected modules: (i) a memory corrosion mechanism that reinforces high-utility reasoning structures while gradually decaying less frequent ones; (ii) a symbolic anchoring engine that utilizes Python for deterministic computation, much like a human uses a calculator; and (iii) a consistency-driven refinement process that aligns neural inference with symbolic outcomes, reducing the accumulation of logical discrepancies. Across multiple reasoning benchmarks, eMoT improves accuracy and solution consistency over standard Chain-of-Thought and structured reasoning baselines.On the traditional task Game of 24, eMoT achieves 100% accuracy, surpassing the baseline by up to 17.6%. Evaluations on mathematical task GSM8K, ASDiv, SVAMP, and MGSM further show consistent gains in multi-step mathematical reasoning. In our evaluation, we achieve superior performance despite utilizing a lightweight backbone model with constrained baseline capabilities. Compared to alternative methods that rely on massively scaled models, our results demonstrate that the performance gains are fundamentally driven by the eMoT framework's reasoning control rather than sheer model size.