# Quantifying and Mitigating Domain Shift in Peach Leaf Damage Classification: Attention Mechanisms and Fine-Tuning Strategies

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02045 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.02045/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 55 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Densely Connected Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.06993/) (2016)
- [EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11946/) (2019)
- [Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.00567/) (2015)
- [MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.04381/) (2018)
- [Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.01507/) (2017)
- [MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.04861/) (2017)
- [CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.06521/) (2018)
- [Searching for MobileNetV3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.02244/) (2019)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02685/) (2019)
- [Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.06839/) (2018)
- [An introduction to domain adaptation and transfer learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.11806/) (2018)
- [PlantDoc: A Dataset for Visual Plant Disease Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.10317/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models for crop damage assessment are typically trained and validated on curated public imagery, yet their behaviour when deployed in real orchards remains poorly quantified. This work measures and mitigates that gap for peach leaf damage classification, where climate-driven abiotic and biotic stresses produce visually similar foliar symptoms. A benchmark of 1366 manually annotated peach leaves covering six damage types was assembled from public sources, and a second, independently acquired dataset of 180 field images across four classes was collected in a commercial orchard as an unseen target domain. Eleven convolutional backbones and three attention-enhanced variants were compared; CBAM-EfficientNetB5 achieved the best source-domain performance (93.3% accuracy, 0.849 macro F1). Applied directly to the target domain, source-trained models lost on average 0.21 macro F1 points (26.5% relative), with 12 of 14 architectures degrading, confirming that benchmark performance substantially overestimates field behaviour. Three fine-tuning strategies were then evaluated as mitigation: feature extraction proved insufficient in nearly all cases, whereas full fine-tuning recovered performance, with CBAM-EfficientNetB3 reaching 0.9459 accuracy and 0.9297 macro F1 on the local domain. Attention mechanisms improved minority-class recall and adaptation efficiency, but did not by themselves confer robustness to domain shift. The results establish a transferability baseline for peach leaf diagnosis and quantify the adaptation cost of moving from public benchmarks to operational orchards.