# A Structured Benchmark for Text-Guided Anomaly Detection: When Language Stops Conditioning the Decision

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01992 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01992/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10045/) (2019)
- [Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.09406/) (2017)
- [Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.02639/) (2019)
- [CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.04015/) (2021)
- [DRAEM -- A discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07610/) (2021)
- [SPot-the-Difference Self-Supervised Pre-training for Anomaly Detection and Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.14315/) (2022)
- [Uninformed Students: Student-Teacher Anomaly Detection with Discriminative Latent Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02357/) (2019)
- [WinCLIP: Zero-/Few-Shot Anomaly Classification and Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14814/) (2023)
- [Improving Unsupervised Defect Segmentation by Applying Structural Similarity to Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.02011/) (2018)
- [VT-ADL: A Vision Transformer Network for Image Anomaly Detection and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.10036/) (2021)
- [AnomalyGPT: Detecting Industrial Anomalies Using Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.15366/) (2023)
- [A Unified Anomaly Synthesis Strategy with Gradient Ascent for Industrial Anomaly Detection and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09359/) (2024)
- [AA-CLIP: Enhancing Zero-shot Anomaly Detection via Anomaly-Aware CLIP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06661/) (2025)
- [Towards Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection and Reasoning with Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.07601/) (2025)
- [MMAD: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models in Industrial Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09453/) (2024)
- [Towards Training-free Anomaly Detection with Vision and Language Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18325/) (2025)
- [Progressive Boundary Guided Anomaly Synthesis for Industrial Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17458/) (2024)
- [EIAD: Explainable Industrial Anomaly Detection Via Multi-Modal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14162/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Industrial anomaly detection has historically been a unimodal task. Recent multimodal vision-language models have produced systems that admit textual input alongside the image and are presented as enabling text-guided zero- and few-shot inspection. Yet these methods are evaluated with protocols inherited from unimodal benchmarks that hold the textual condition constant and therefore cannot measure whether language conditions the decision; whether reported gains reflect text guidance or strong pretrained visual features remains open. We introduce Text-Guided Anomaly Detection (TGAD), a structured benchmark that progressively increases the functional role of language across three scenarios: a controlled prompt-sensitivity setting on MVTec AD; a component-tagged extension of MVTec AD that requires the model to restrict its assessment to an instructed part; and the new Assembled Panel Dataset (APD), a realistic industrial setting that requires both defect-type and component-location knowledge. We evaluate one representative model per paradigm: generative large vision-language, training-free discriminative, and embedding-adaptive discriminative. In all three, the textual interface conditions the decision only superficially: prompt content is absorbed unless the object noun is removed (the generative model's I-AUROC drops from 97.4 to 82.6); component-level instructions do not constrain the decision once defects outside the instructed part are admitted as normal (from 90.3 to 66.3); and when both combine on APD, image-level discrimination collapses below the MVTec level, in one case below chance (71.2, 50.5, 31.5). These results suggest that standard benchmarks overstate the text-guided capabilities of current multimodal anomaly detection systems, and that a protocol of this kind is a prerequisite for models that can be reliably controlled through language for industrial deployment.