# Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01145 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01145/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 139 of its 364 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 139)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16130/) (2024)
- [Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12588/) (2022)
- [OpenAI GPT-5 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03267/) (2025)
- [STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14465/) (2022)
- [DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02556/) (2025)
- [GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15763/) (2026)
- [Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02276/) (2026)
- [SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.21798/) (2025)
- [HuatuoGPT-o1, Towards Medical Complex Reasoning with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18925/) (2024)
- [AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07960/) (2024)
- [Can large language models reason about medical questions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.08143/) (2022)
- [Hierarchical Reasoning Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21734/) (2025)
- [LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10362/) (2024)
- [InternLM-Math: Open Math Large Language Models Toward Verifiable Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06332/) (2024)
- [MedReason: Eliciting Factual Medical Reasoning Steps in LLMs via Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00993/) (2025)
- [LLM Social Simulations Are a Promising Research Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02234/) (2025)
- [Fin-R1: A Large Language Model for Financial Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16252/) (2025)
- [Mathematical exploration and discovery at scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.02864/) (2025)
- [OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12753/) (2024)
- [MultiMath: Bridging Visual and Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.00147/) (2024)
- [K2: A Foundation Language Model for Geoscience Knowledge Understanding and Utilization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05064/) (2023)
- [OptiBench Meets ReSocratic: Measure and Improve LLMs for Optimization Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09887/) (2024)
- [CAD-Coder: Text-to-CAD Generation with Chain-of-Thought and Geometric Reward](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19713/) (2025)
- [Do LLM Agents Exhibit Social Behavior?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15198/) (2023)
- [MCP-Atlas: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Tool-Use Competency with Real MCP Servers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00933/) (2026)
- [UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.00334/) (2025)
- [FrontierScience: Evaluating AI's Ability to Perform Expert-Level Scientific Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.21165/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While Reasoning Language Models (RLMs) are rapidly emerging as powerful tools for scientific research, their impact is primarily concentrated in "hard science" fields. The slow -- or lack of -- adoption of RLMs in other branches of science is causing a widening gap in research productivity. In this survey, we provide the first comprehensive analysis of RLM adoption across 28 scientific disciplines following the classification used by the European Research Council (ERC), spanning the Social Sciences and Humanities, Physical Sciences and Engineering, and Life Sciences. We examine how RLMs are developed, evaluated, and applied across disciplines. Furthermore, we introduce a maturity-oriented assessment framework based on available domain-specific development and evaluation resources, revealing substantial disparities in RLM maturity that become even more pronounced when only publicly available resources are considered. Finally, we highlight current implementation paradigms that are gaining popularity across disciplines, current challenges, and future directions in enabling RLM adoption across science.