# Student Capacity Moderates Knowledge Distillation Effectiveness: A Systematic Study Across ResNet Teacher-Student Pairs on CIFAR-10

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31191 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.31191/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General knowledge distillation methods, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation.
- Builds on 12 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

## Placed in

- Knowledge distillation / [General knowledge distillation methods](https://mlsanity.com/distill/general-knowledge-distillation-methods/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6550/) (2014)
- [Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.03928/) (2016)
- [Contrastive Representation Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10699/) (2019)
- [Improved Knowledge Distillation via Teacher Assistant](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.03393/) (2019)
- [Decoupled Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.08679/) (2022)
- [On the Efficacy of Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01348/) (2019)
- [Distilling Knowledge via Knowledge Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09044/) (2021)
- [Knowledge distillation: A good teacher is patient and consistent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05237/) (2021)
- [Knowledge Distillation from A Stronger Teacher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10536/) (2022)
- [Does Knowledge Distillation Really Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05945/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate how teacher-student capacity relationships modulate knowledge distillation (KD) effectiveness in ResNet-based image classification on CIFAR-10. Across four teacher-student pairs (R50->R18, R34->R18, R50->R34, and R101->R34) we compare Logit-KD and Feature-KD under a strict evaluation protocol: hyperparameters and checkpoints are selected on a held-out validation split, selected configurations are re-run with five seeds, and the test set is used exclusively for final reporting. Beyond accuracy, we measure distillation fidelity directly via teacher-student agreement and KL divergence. We report four findings. First, the student-capacity pattern survives the corrected protocol at reduced magnitude: the only statistically significant gains occur for R34 students under Feature-KD (+0.19 and +0.21 pp, p<0.05), in two pairs whose teachers differ two-fold in parameters but not in accuracy, localizing the moderating variable on the student side, while no KD gain for R18 students is distinguishable from zero. Second, Feature-KD matches or outperforms Logit-KD in all four pairs, and its students land closer to the teacher's output distribution (KL at T=1) than Logit-KD students despite never observing teacher logits. Third, top-1 teacher-student agreement is flat across all pairs, decoupling fidelity from accuracy gains. Fourth, architecture dominates KD: correcting the ResNet stem for 32x32 inputs is worth +5.5 to +7.2 pp, more than 25x the largest KD gain. We also retract an attribution made in v1: a controlled re-run shows the reported gradient-clipping bug had no measurable effect, and v1's larger gains are explained by test-set selection. Code and results: github.com/umutonuryasar/kd-capacity-gap (tag v2.0).