# Does Visual Information Play a Decisive Role in Vision-Language-Action Model Driving Behavior?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31041 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.31041/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLA for autonomous driving, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models.
- Builds on 23 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

## Placed in

- Vision-language-action models / [VLA for autonomous driving](https://mlsanity.com/vla/vla-for-autonomous-driving/)
- End-to-end autonomous driving / [Reasoning VLA and VLM driving policies](https://mlsanity.com/driving/reasoning-vla-and-vlm-driving-policies/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.11027/) (2019)
- [Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.12261/) (2019)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07780/) (2020)
- [An Image is Worth 1/2 Tokens After Layer 2: Plug-and-Play Inference Acceleration for Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06764/) (2024)
- [Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.00377/) (2017)
- [Counterfactual VQA: A Cause-Effect Look at Language Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04315/) (2020)
- [Balanced Multimodal Learning via On-the-fly Gradient Modulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15332/) (2022)
- [AutoVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Adaptive Reasoning and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13757/) (2025)
- [Is Ego Status All You Need for Open-Loop End-to-End Autonomous Driving?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03031/) (2023)
- [ReCogDrive: A Reinforced Cognitive Framework for End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08052/) (2025)
- [OpenDriveVLA: Towards End-to-end Autonomous Driving with Large Vision Language Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23463/) (2025)
- [SimLingo: Vision-Only Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving with Language-Action Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09594/) (2025)
- [Alpamayo-R1: Bridging Reasoning and Action Prediction for Generalizable Autonomous Driving in the Long Tail](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.00088/) (2025)
- [Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Grounded](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.03751/) (2019)
- [Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11040/) (2023)
- [Vision-Language-Action (VLA) Models: Concepts, Progress, Applications and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.04769/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.24044/) (2025)
- [NeuroNCAP: Photorealistic Closed-loop Safety Testing for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07762/) (2024)
- [Impromptu VLA: Open Weights and Open Data for Driving Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23757/) (2025)
- [Drive-R1: Bridging Reasoning and Planning in VLMs for Autonomous Driving with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18234/) (2025)
- [SteerVLA: Steering Vision-Language-Action Models in Long-Tail Driving Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08440/) (2026)
- [Decoupling Scene Perception and Ego Status: A Multi-Context Fusion Approach for Enhanced Generalization in End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.13079/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated promising capability in autonomous driving, highlighting the potential of unified multimodal architectures for jointly modeling perception and planning. However, how current VLA-based driving behavior is grounded in visual information remains poorly understood. Existing evaluation protocols mainly focus on aggregate performance metrics, lacking structured and practical diagnostics to quantify visual-behavior dependency. In this work, we introduce a structured multi-level visual perturbation framework to analyze visual-behavior dependency in VLA-based driving models systematically. The framework organizes controlled visual perturbations along three complementary dimensions: channellevel degradation, information-level disruption, and structurelevel modification. We apply it to VLA-based driving systems and evaluate behavioral responses under both open-loop trajectory prediction and interactive closed-loop safety evaluation. Experimental results reveal evaluation-dependent dependency patterns and uneven visual grounding across abstraction levels. These findings call for more structured analyses and principled design of VLA driving models to better understand how visual information shapes behavior and develop safer, more robust systems.