# MineExplorer: Evaluating Open-World Exploration of MLLM Agents in Minecraft

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30931 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30931/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for LLM agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 21 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Reinforcement learning for LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/reinforcement-learning-for-llm-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [MineDojo: Building Open-Ended Embodied Agents with Internet-Scale Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08853/) (2022)
- [EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09560/) (2025)
- [JARVIS-1: Open-World Multi-task Agents with Memory-Augmented Multimodal Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05997/) (2023)
- [BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.13543/) (2024)
- [ChatVLA: Unified Multimodal Understanding and Robot Control with Vision-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14420/) (2025)
- [lmgame-Bench: How Good are LLMs at Playing Games?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15146/) (2025)
- [GROOT: Learning to Follow Instructions by Watching Gameplay Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08235/) (2023)
- [VideoGameBench: Can Vision-Language Models complete popular video games?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18134/) (2025)
- [MCU: An Evaluation Framework for Open-Ended Game Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08367/) (2023)
- [GLM-5V-Turbo: Toward a Native Foundation Model for Multimodal Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.26752/) (2026)
- [Orak: A Foundational Benchmark for Training and Evaluating LLM Agents on Diverse Video Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03610/) (2025)
- [OmniJARVIS: Unified Vision-Language-Action Tokenization Enables Open-World Instruction Following Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00114/) (2024)
- [JARVIS-VLA: Post-Training Large-Scale Vision Language Models to Play Visual Games with Keyboards and Mouse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16365/) (2025)
- [GameWorld: Towards Standardized and Verifiable Evaluation of Multimodal Game Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07429/) (2026)
- [Odyssey: Empowering Minecraft Agents with Open-World Skills](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15325/) (2024)
- [ROCKET-1: Mastering Open-World Interaction with Visual-Temporal Context Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17856/) (2024)
- [BEDD: The MineRL BASALT Evaluation and Demonstrations Dataset for Training and Benchmarking Agents that Solve Fuzzy Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02405/) (2023)
- [CitySeeker: How Do VLMS Explore Embodied Urban Navigation With Implicit Human Needs?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.16755/) (2025)
- [MineAnyBuild: Benchmarking Spatial Planning for Open-world AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20148/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [MirrorCraft: Paired Evaluation under Hidden Rule Changes in Minecraft](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.29218/) (2026)
- [UrbanGround: From Local Perception to Spatial Agency in a Real-Scale City](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.27456/) (2026)
- [ULTRADISCOVERY: Abductive Exploration in an Interconnected, Epistemically Open Universe](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.03092/) (2026)
- [Mine Odyssey: Benchmarking Spatial Agentic Intelligence in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.11328/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong capabilities in perception, reasoning, and action generation. However, their ability to sustain exploration in dynamic open worlds remains unclear. Existing embodied and game-based benchmarks often compress interaction into short-horizon tasks or entangle success with domain-specific game mechanics. In this paper, we introduce MineExplorer benchmark for evaluating open-world exploration capabilities of MLLM agents in Minecraft. We first filter atomic tasks whose solutions rely heavily on Minecraft-specific knowledge to better reflect general open-world reasoning. Then we organize the benchmark around a ReAct-style capability formulation and compose atomic tasks into implicit multi-hop tasks. To further construct reliable instances, MineExplorer uses a multi-agent synthesis workflow that jointly designs task graphs, sandbox scenes, and rule-based milestone evaluators. Human evaluation shows that the multi-agent synthesis workflow produces significantly more reliable instances than a single-agent baseline. Experiments with advanced MLLM agents show that open-world exploration remains challenging, as strong models can handle many single-hop tasks but degrade sharply when hidden prerequisites must be coordinated over longer trajectories. Further analysis finds that task difficulty tracks agent completion, and larger models or thinking modes do not consistently translate into better performance. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/meituan-longcat/MineExplorer.