# MAAT: Multi-phase Adapter-Aware Targeted Unlearning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30514 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30514/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 24 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Machine unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/safety/machine-unlearning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07229/) (2022)
- [TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06121/) (2024)
- [The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03218/) (2024)
- [Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05868/) (2024)
- [Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04115/) (2017)
- [SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12508/) (2023)
- [Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04313/) (2024)
- [MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06460/) (2024)
- [AlphaEdit: Null-Space Constrained Knowledge Editing for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02355/) (2024)
- [Fast Machine Unlearning Without Retraining Through Selective Synaptic Dampening](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07707/) (2023)
- [Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07163/) (2024)
- [Continual Learning and Private Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12817/) (2022)
- [KGA: A General Machine Unlearning Framework Based on Knowledge Gap Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06535/) (2023)
- [Unlearning or Obfuscating? Jogging the Memory of Unlearned LLMs via Benign Relearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13356/) (2024)
- [OpenUnlearning: Accelerating LLM Unlearning via Unified Benchmarking of Methods and Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12618/) (2025)
- [Position: LLM Unlearning Benchmarks are Weak Measures of Progress](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02879/) (2024)
- [Towards Robust and Parameter-Efficient Knowledge Unlearning for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06621/) (2024)
- [Mechanistic Unlearning: Robust Knowledge Unlearning and Editing via Mechanistic Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12949/) (2024)
- [FACTIFY-5WQA: 5W Aspect-based Fact Verification through Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04329/) (2023)
- [Propagation and Pitfalls: Reasoning-based Assessment of Knowledge Editing through Counterfactual Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.17585/) (2024)
- [The Singular Value Decomposition, Applications and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.08532/) (2015)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Machine unlearning evaluation is structurally skewed: Why-type questions, which probe causal and relational knowledge, comprise less than 0.06% of CounterFact, 0.6% of ZSRE, and less than 1.3% of TOFU, MUSE, and WMDP-Cyber. This near-zero representation means that methods that fail on causal knowledge can score highly in aggregate, and this failure is undetectable without balanced evaluation. We present 5WBENCH, a balanced 5,000-sample benchmark with 1,000 examples per 5W category (Who, What, When, Where, Why), making causal unlearning failures quantifiable for the first time. Using 5WBENCH, we show that no existing baseline simultaneously achieves high forgetting and high retention on Why-type questions: aggressive forgetting degrades retained knowledge, while conservative methods fail to forget causal facts. Why-type difficulty stems from multi-hop reasoning chains (44% of Why entries vs. less than or equal to 2% for others) and gradient dilution over 40.1-token answer spans. We present MAAT (Multi-phase Adapter-Aware Targeted Unlearning), a three-phase framework operating on LoRA adapter weights, combining gradient-projected ascent, SVD rank-dimension pruning, task vector negation, and hybrid KL-hidden-state retain repair. MAAT is the first method to simultaneously achieve high forgetting and high retention on Why-type causal knowledge, reaching a new operating point on the forget-retain Pareto frontier. We make our code publicly available.