# Linear Separability of Activation Representations after Supervised Fine-Tuning on Incorrect Responses: A Study of Synthetic Dishonesty in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30381 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30381/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Probing deception, bias and beliefs, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability.
- Builds on 3 of its 3 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.

## Placed in

- Mechanistic interpretability / [Probing deception, bias and beliefs](https://mlsanity.com/mechinterp/probing-deception-bias-and-beliefs/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [Fast Model Editing at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11309/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

When a language model is fine-tuned to produce systematically incorrect responses, does this training leave a structured, linearly recoverable trace in its internal activations? We study this question in a controlled model-organism setting using five transformer architectures spanning 1.4 to 9 billion parameters. For each model, an "honest" and a "dishonest" LoRA fine-tuned variant are constructed using identical question distributions but correct versus plausible-but-incorrect answers. Linear probes reach near-ceiling separability (AUC >= 0.9997) within the first few layers in four of five architectures. This separability transfers from TruthfulQA to held-out MMLU subjects for four models, but substantially less so for Pythia-1.4B. Six geometric analyses reveal an architectural dichotomy in representation structure. A control experiment further shows that LoRA fine-tuning itself leaves a strong activation fingerprint that is largely dissociable from the honesty-related signal, independent of fine-tuning data content. Two supplementary experiments qualify these findings: the identified direction transfers poorly to paraphrased questions, with AUC approaching chance, and norm-calibrated activation steering provides no reliable evidence of a causal role in generation, partly because stronger interventions disrupt output fluency. These results characterize what supervised fine-tuning on incorrect responses induces in activation space while clarifying important limitations on interpretation and causal significance.
