# Reinforcement Learning with Robust Rubric Rewards

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30244 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30244/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 36 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reinforcement learning for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reinforcement-learning-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00398/) (2020)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.07726/) (2024)
- [MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14624/) (2024)
- [Measuring Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with MATH-Vision Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14804/) (2024)
- [VLM-R1: A Stable and Generalizable R1-style Large Vision-Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07615/) (2025)
- [MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02813/) (2024)
- [Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02276/) (2026)
- [GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06471/) (2025)
- [InfographicVQA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.12756/) (2021)
- [HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Health](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08775/) (2025)
- [Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17746/) (2025)
- [VL-Rethinker: Incentivizing Self-Reflection of Vision-Language Models with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08837/) (2025)
- [PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01848/) (2025)
- [We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01284/) (2024)
- [DynaMath: A Dynamic Visual Benchmark for Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Robustness of Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00836/) (2024)
- [OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07743/) (2025)
- [Checklists Are Better Than Reward Models For Aligning Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18624/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning with Rubric Anchors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.12790/) (2025)
- [LLM-Rubric: A Multidimensional, Calibrated Approach to Automated Evaluation of Natural Language Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00274/) (2024)
- [SimpleVQA: Multimodal Factuality Evaluation for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13059/) (2025)
- [Breaking the Exploration Bottleneck: Rubric-Scaffolded Reinforcement Learning for General LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.16949/) (2025)
- [Alternating Reinforcement Learning for Rubric-Based Reward Modeling in Non-Verifiable LLM Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01511/) (2026)
- [RubricHub: A Comprehensive and Highly Discriminative Rubric Dataset via Automated Coarse-to-Fine Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08430/) (2026)
- [Online Rubrics Elicitation from Pairwise Comparisons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07284/) (2025)
- [OpenMMReasoner: Pushing the Frontiers for Multimodal Reasoning with an Open and General Recipe](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.16334/) (2025)
- [Judge Anything: MLLM as a Judge Across Any Modality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17489/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [ScienceBuddy: Recursive-in-Recursive Self-Improvement for Interactive Scientific Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.17523/) (2026)
- [Who Teaches Which Token? Verifier-Gated Multi-Expert On-Policy Distillation for Scientific Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.15404/) (2026)
- [MetaRubric: Learning to Reward for Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.02824/) (2026)
- [Verify Less, Evolve More: Training Idea-Level Critics for Verification-Efficient ML Evolving Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08993/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is effective for deterministically checkable tasks, many vision-language tasks are partially verifiable, demanding multi-criteria supervision (e.g., perceptual details, reasoning steps, and constraints). Rubrics provide a natural interface for this fine-grained supervision, but their effectiveness depends on the execution accuracy during online RL. We propose Reinforcement Learning with Robust Rubric Rewards (RLR3), extending RLVR from task-level verification to criterion-level verification. RLR3 routes instance-specific rubrics through two execution paths: an LLM-as-an-extractor paired with a deterministic verifier, or an LLM-as-a-Judge for non-verifiable criteria. To ensure faithful scoring, RLR3 introduce a minimal exposure strategy that masks ground truths from extractors and images from judges. Furthermore, RLR3 employs hierarchical aggregation to prioritize essential criteria over additional criteria, and mitigates score saturation within rollout groups. Evaluated on Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B across 15 benchmarks, RLR3 consistently outperforms RLVR, yielding a 4.7-point improvement over the base model and exceeding the official instruct-to-thinking model gap. Controlled audits confirm our deterministic verification and minimal exposure significantly reduce exploitable false positives.