# ActTraitBench: Quantifying the Knowledge-Decision Gap in Large Language Models via Human-Grounded Behavioral Validation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29791 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29791/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19348/) (2026)
- [Who is GPT-3? An Exploration of Personality, Values and Demographics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14338/) (2022)
- [Mind the Value-Action Gap: Do LLMs Act in Alignment with Their Values?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15463/) (2025)
- [The Personality Illusion: Revealing Dissociation Between Self-Reports & Behavior in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.03730/) (2025)
- [Challenging the Validity of Personality Tests for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05297/) (2023)
- [Can LLM Agents Maintain a Persona in Discourse?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11843/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [CogArena: A Multimethod Evaluation of Cognitive Ability Structure in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.24999/) (2026)
- [On the Behavioral Traits of LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32776/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While Large Language Models (LLMs) can convincingly simulate personas in explicit self-reports, they often deviate in implicit behavioral decisions, revealing a substantial Knowledge-Decision Gap (GKD). Existing benchmarks struggle to measure this discrepancy due to limited construct validity, multidimensional entanglement, and distributional biases in LLM-based evaluation. To address these issues, we propose ActTraitBench, a human-grounded evaluation framework for measuring personality consistency in LLMs. Grounded in empirical human data, ActTraitBench establishes one-to-one mappings between psychometric facets and behavioral paradigms and applies Distributional Calibration via Quantile Mapping to reduce distributional mismatch between LLM-judge scores and human responses. Experiments on 14 mainstream LLMs reveal substantial knowledge-decision gaps and show that assigned personas are reflected more consistently in self-reports than in behavioral decisions for most evaluated models. To mitigate this gap, we further introduce the Chain of Cognitive Alignment (CoCA), an inference-time intervention that reduces GKD for 12 of the 13 models with paired results. Code and resources are available at https://github.com/Selina233/ActTraitBench.
