# Improving Collaborative Storytelling with a Multi-Agent Framework Based on Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29625 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29625/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Multimodal and embodied agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/multimodal-and-embodied-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08593/) (2019)
- [Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00118/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07327/) (2023)
- [Instruction Tuning with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03277/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Can Self-Improve](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11610/) (2022)
- [Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12917/) (2024)
- [Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03047/) (2023)
- [Self-Preference Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21819/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models and Games: A Survey and Roadmap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18659/) (2024)
- [Language Model Self-improvement by Reinforcement Learning Contemplation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14483/) (2023)
- [MarioGPT: Open-Ended Text2Level Generation through Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05981/) (2023)
- [PACE: Improving Prompt with Actor-Critic Editing for Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10088/) (2023)
- [What Makes a Good Story and How Can We Measure It? A Comprehensive Survey of Story Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.14622/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Creativity in Computational Co-Creative Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.09886/) (2018)
- [Story Designer: Towards a Mixed-Initiative Tool to Create Narrative Structures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09294/) (2022)
- [An Evaluation of State-of-the-Art Large Language Models for Sarcasm Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03706/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Quality of Gaming Narratives Co-created with AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.04239/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The topic of Co-creation, i.e., AI agents interacting with humans to generate outputs (e.g., art), has gained significant attention recently. However, most studies focus on adult-human interactions in a digital setting. This paper explores a novel ludic co-creation scenario involving children and Large Language Models (LLMs) interacting through a physical board game to create written stories. Our goal is to develop a multi-agent framework capable of producing high-quality narratives suitable for young players. At the core of our approach is an iterative Writer-Editor process in which one LLM generates stories while another evaluates them and provides feedback for refinement. Through a simulation study involving multiple LLMs, we show that this iterative interaction consistently improves the perceived quality of generated stories across successive loops. The results indicate that a small number of refinement steps may be sufficient to achieve high-quality outputs in interactive storytelling systems.