# Slogans or Stance? A Label-Light Diagnostic for Entrepreneurial-Discourse Measurement on Chinese SOE Speeches

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29188 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29188/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 57 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1310.4546/) (2013)
- [C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07597/) (2023)
- [Measurement and Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.05511/) (2019)
- [Top2Vec: Distributed Representations of Topics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.09470/) (2020)
- [Zero-Shot Stance Detection: A Dataset and Model using Generalized Topic Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03640/) (2020)
- [Framing and Agenda-setting in Russian News: a Computational Analysis of Intricate Political Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.09386/) (2018)
- [An Empirical Study on Large-Scale Multi-Label Text Classification Including Few and Zero-Shot Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01653/) (2020)
- [FinMTEB: Finance Massive Text Embedding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10990/) (2025)
- [Weakly- and Semi-supervised Evidence Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01459/) (2020)
- [CoPHE: A Count-Preserving Hierarchical Evaluation Metric in Large-Scale Multi-Label Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.04853/) (2021)
- [FinNLI: Novel Dataset for Multi-Genre Financial Natural Language Inference Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16188/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Dictionary methods, topic models, and embedding-similarity scorers are widely used in CSS and management research to measure constructs such as "entrepreneurial spirit" in corporate speeches. We contribute a label-light measurement diagnostic for such instruments rather than a new extraction model. On a corpus of 80 speeches by leaders of centrally administered Chinese state-owned enterprises, we exploit a natural experiment of 24 same-company different-speaker pairs and 5 same-company same-speaker pairs to test whether a method's per-document indices vary with leader identity holding firm constant. LDA fails (Cohen d=0.20, 95% CI [-0.72, 1.20]); a dictionary scorer reaches d=0.81 and a Chinese sentence encoder d=0.65 on doc-vector distances of order 10^-3. A zero-shot 9B open-weight LLM (Qwen3.5:9b) raises paired-contrast d to 1.09 (exact permutation p1=0.034). We downgrade three claims accordingly: gold F1 measures consistency with the LLM's own prompt rule rather than external construct recovery; doc-level style residualisation cuts the LLM's d to 0.43 (p1=0.22), so roughly half of the effect is consistent with leader idiolect; and a confidence-weighted calibration trades Delta for variance with an auto-mined slogan lexicon near-inert in ablation. We release the 2,190-segment scored corpus, the 170-paragraph pilot, the slogan lexicon, two-family LLM scores, and the evaluation harness.