# Adopt neq Adapt: Longitudinal Analyses of LLM Conversations in the Wild

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29018 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29018/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01470/) (2024)
- [WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04770/) (2024)
- [Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04761/) (2025)
- [Trust No Bot: Discovering Personal Disclosures in Human-LLM Conversations in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11438/) (2024)
- [The Shifted and The Overlooked: A Task-oriented Investigation of User-GPT Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12418/) (2023)
- [Using Large Language Models to Generate, Validate, and Apply User Intent Taxonomies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13063/) (2023)
- [WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15549/) (2024)
- [WildVis: Open Source Visualizer for Million-Scale Chat Logs in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.03753/) (2024)
- [Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07935/) (2025)
- [The Use of Generative Search Engines for Knowledge Work and Complex Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04268/) (2024)
- [Not Just Novelty: A Longitudinal Study on Utility and Customization of an AI Workflow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09894/) (2024)
- [Longitudinal Study on Social and Emotional Use of AI Conversational Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14112/) (2025)
- [Show or Tell? Modeling the evolution of request-making in Human-LLM conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.01213/) (2025)
- [Priming, Path-dependence, and Plasticity: Understanding the molding of user-LLM interaction and its implications from (many) chat logs in the wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.05767/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [AI Fiction in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.22748/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Although a growing body of research has begun to describe user--LLM interactions, the picture it paints is largely static; little is known about how individual users change their behavior over time. To address this gap, we analyze the conversational trajectories of ~12,000 randomly sampled Microsoft Bing Copilot users and compare these with data from WildChat-4.8M. While the Copilot data contains significant population-level trends, we find that trends in individual user trajectories are much weaker; user habits prove to be overwhelmingly sticky. We also find stark differences between users of different activity levels: more active users have more successful conversations and use the LLM for more complex and professionally oriented tasks. Some user trends also appear in WildChat-4.8M, but we find evidence that this dataset is significantly skewed towards highly proficient "power" users. Ultimately, our results suggest that existing user behavior is difficult to change and demonstrate the extent of user heterogeneity. Our comparison between datasets highlights that WildChat does not represent typical user--AI interactions, an important caveat for downstream uses of the data.