# Benchmarking Open-Source Safety Guard Models: A Comprehensive Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28830 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28830/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04249/) (2024)
- [RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.11462/) (2020)
- [BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04657/) (2023)
- [WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18495/) (2024)
- [A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreaks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10260/) (2024)
- [SALAD-Bench: A Hierarchical and Comprehensive Safety Benchmark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05044/) (2024)
- [SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07045/) (2023)
- [GuardReasoner: Towards Reasoning-based LLM Safeguards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.18492/) (2025)
- [CultureGuard: Towards Culturally-Aware Dataset and Guard Model for Multilingual Safety Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.01710/) (2025)
- [Enhancing LLM Safety Through a Theoretical Minimax Game Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05163/) (2025)
- [MetaHate: A Dataset for Unifying Efforts on Hate Speech Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06526/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Who Judges the Judges? A Chinese Safety QA Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Responses and Safety Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.01210/) (2026)
- [Towards a Unified Misuse Monitoring Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.07089/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in safety-critical applications, robust content moderation becomes essential. We present a comprehensive evaluation of 14 open-source safety guard models on a curated benchmark of 79,331 samples spanning 8 NIST AI Risk Framework safety categories. Our benchmark aggregates four diverse datasets (HarmBench, StrongREJECT, RealToxicityPrompts, and BeaverTails), filtered to focus exclusively on safety-relevant content (violence, hate speech, harassment, sexual content, suicide/self-harm, profanity, threats, and health misinformation). We find that recall is the critical metric for safety applications, as missing harmful content poses greater risk than false positives. Our evaluation reveals surprising results: Qwen Guard (4B parameters) achieves the highest recall (83.97%) while larger models like Llama Guard (12B) and GPT-OSS Safeguard (20B) exhibit conservative behavior, missing up to 75% of unsafe content. We demonstrate that model size does not correlate with safety detection performance and that general-purpose guard models outperform specialized ones. These findings provide practical guidance for selecting safety guard models in production deployments.