# The Abstraction Gap in Vision-Language Causal Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28779 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28779/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 15 of its 80 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12966/) (2023)
- [LLaVA-CoT: Let Vision Language Models Reason Step-by-Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10440/) (2024)
- [AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07397/) (2023)
- [CogVLM2: Visual Language Models for Image and Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.16500/) (2024)
- [On the Measure of Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.01547/) (2019)
- [VL-CheckList: Evaluating Pre-trained Vision-Language Models with Objects, Attributes and Relations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00221/) (2022)
- [Faithfulness vs. Plausibility: On the (Un)Reliability of Explanations from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04614/) (2024)
- [CausalVQA: A Physically Grounded Causal Reasoning Benchmark for Video Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09943/) (2025)
- [MM-CoT:A Benchmark for Probing Visual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.08228/) (2025)
- [MM-IQ: Benchmarking Human-Like Abstraction and Reasoning in Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.00698/) (2025)
- [TimeCausality: Evaluating the Causal Ability in Time Dimension for Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15435/) (2025)
- [CausalVLR: A Toolbox and Benchmark for Visual-Linguistic Causal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17462/) (2023)
- [InfoCausalQA:Can Models Perform Non-explicit Causal Reasoning Based on Infographic?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06220/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) generate fluent causal explanations, but current evaluations cannot distinguish linguistic plausibility from faithful causal reasoning. We introduce a dual-probe methodology that isolates these properties. The Text-Only Probe measures linguistic quality. The Chain-Text Probe requires models to first generate explicit causal chains. The Abstraction Gap (AG) metric quantifies the normalized performance difference. Evaluating eight VLMs on CAGE (Causal Abstraction Gap Evaluation), a benchmark of 49,500 questions across 5,500 images spanning Pearl's causal hierarchy, we find seven models exhibit AG exceeding 0.50 with text scores of 6--8 but chain scores below 2.5. Fine-tuning on 45,000 chain-annotated examples fails to close the gap. However, one model achieves near-zero AG. The capability exists within current VLM architectures and depends on pretraining and architectural choices. CAGE provides a diagnostic tool for assessing faithful causal reasoning in VLMs.