# MIRAGE: Context-Aware Prompt Injection against Mobile GUI Agents via User-Generated Content

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28116 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28116/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 11 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)
- LLM safety and security / [Prompt injection and agent security](https://mlsanity.com/safety/prompt-injection-and-agent-security/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12173/) (2023)
- [Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09527/) (2022)
- [AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14573/) (2024)
- [Jailbreak in pieces: Compositional Adversarial Attacks on Multi-Modal Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14539/) (2023)
- [EIA: Environmental Injection Attack on Generalist Web Agents for Privacy Leakage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.11295/) (2024)
- [Hidden Ghost Hand: Unveiling Backdoor Vulnerabilities in MLLM-Powered Mobile GUI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14418/) (2025)
- [GhostEI-Bench: Do Mobile Agents Resilience to Environmental Injection in Dynamic On-Device Environments?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.20333/) (2025)
- [Mobile GUI Agents under Real-world Threats: Are We There Yet?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04227/) (2025)
- [Improving User Interface Generation Models from Designer Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16779/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [When Agents See Differently: Exposing UI Desynchronization Threats in Mobile Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.16732/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Mobile graphical user interface (GUI) agents driven by vision-language models (VLMs) perceive the screen as rendered pixels and choose actions from what they see, so they cannot reliably separate trusted interface elements from user-generated content. We present MIRAGE (Mobile Injection of Realistic Adversarial GUI Examples), a pipeline that turns benign mobile screenshots into prompt-injection samples by placing attacker-controlled text into ordinary user-generated content regions, without modifying the agent, the application, or the operating system. MIRAGE operates in three stages: a Localizer identifies user-controllable regions on the screenshot, a Generator synthesises context-aware payloads and renders them in the application's native style, and a Curator moderates realism and balances the samples across applications, region types, and attack intents. A key challenge is that an injected screenshot must stay visually indistinguishable from genuine user content while still diverting the agent; we address this by separating the stages that control reach, realism, and distributional balance. On a 1,111-sample benchmark spanning ten applications and eleven attack intents, all five evaluated VLM agents are vulnerable, with attack success rates of 23%-30%, and MIRAGE scores higher on human realism ratings than the strongest prior attack (3.02 versus 2.52 out of 5). We further find that per-sample realism and attack success are uncorrelated, so visual-quality filtering alone cannot reliably defend against this threat.