# UniACE: A Unified Framework for Evaluating LLM Agentic Capabilities

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27898 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.27898/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 13 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08155/) (2023)
- [OpenAI GPT-5 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03267/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02556/) (2025)
- [BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12516/) (2025)
- [τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07982/) (2025)
- [AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13178/) (2024)
- [MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10537/) (2023)
- [Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14470/) (2024)
- [MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01935/) (2025)
- [General Agent Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.22953/) (2026)
- [STT-Arena: A More Realistic Environment for Tool-Using with Spatio-Temporal Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.18548/) (2026)
- ["LLM Agent Performance" Is Not a Single Evaluation Target](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03238/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Scaling Large Reasoning Models beyond Human Supervision: A Path toward Superintelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.31075/) (2026)
- [EduClaw-Bench: A Long-Horizon Benchmark for Pedagogical LLM Agents with Simulated Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.03206/) (2026)
- [Bad Genius: Counterfactual-Guided Harness Evolution Beyond Task-Specific Shortcuts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.18366/) (2026)
- [EPC: A Standardized Protocol for Measuring Evaluator Preference Dynamics in LLM Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.00297/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Agent benchmarks are increasingly used to compare large language models (LLMs) across domains, yet a reported score reflects a complete model--harness--environment configuration rather than the model alone. Benchmark packages couple native tasks with specific prompts, tool protocols, orchestration logic, and sometimes dynamic external resources, making cross-benchmark comparisons sensitive to implementation and resource conditions. We present UniACE, a unified framework for model-centric evaluation under an explicit, common execution condition. UniACE represents each benchmark as an instruction--tool--environment triplet, executes LLMs through a shared, task-agnostic harness in isolated per-task runtimes, and preserves native success criteria. For tasks that rely on dynamic resources, an optional offline mode replaces live access with fixed, pre-collected snapshots. Its evaluation protocol further standardizes efficiency measurement, execution records, and trace-based failure attribution. We migrate 7 benchmarks spanning 24 domains and evaluate 15 models in more than 400K rollouts consuming 5B tokens. Comparisons with source implementations show large bidirectional score changes and model-ranking reversals, while matched online and offline runs reveal substantial sensitivity to accessible evidence and its representation. Under the shared UniACE configuration, efficiency and failure profiles expose task-dependent model behaviors hidden by task-success scores alone. These findings motivate reporting agent benchmark outcomes as properties of an explicit evaluation configuration, enabling more interpretable and reproducible cross-benchmark comparisons. Codes and benchmarks at are available at https://github.com/whfeLingYu/A-Unified-Framework-for-the-Evaluation-of-LLM-Agentic-Capabilities, https://huggingface.co/datasets/whfeLingYu/Unified_Agent_Framework.