# Eliot: Interactively underlineExploring Fast-Changing Scientific underlineLiterature Trends with underlineOnline Daunderlineta and Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27610 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.27610/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.03426/) (2018)
- [SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.10676/) (2019)
- [BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05794/) (2022)
- [PaperQA: Retrieval-Augmented Generative Agent for Scientific Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.07559/) (2023)
- [Language agents achieve superhuman synthesis of scientific knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13740/) (2024)
- [OpenScholar: Synthesizing Scientific Literature with Retrieval-augmented LMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.14199/) (2024)
- [On the Prospects of Incorporating Large Language Models (LLMs) in Automated Planning and Scheduling (APS)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.02500/) (2024)
- [Knowledge Navigator: LLM-guided Browsing Framework for Exploratory Search in Scientific Literature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15836/) (2024)
- [The Singular Value Decomposition, Applications and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.08532/) (2015)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid growth of scientific publishing has made it increasingly difficult to track how fast-moving areas evolve. Search engines and LLM-based assistants retrieve or summarize papers, but often hide how the corpus was selected, organized, or connected to temporal patterns. We present textttEliot, a publicly deployed interactive system for traceable exploration of evolving scientific literature. Motivated by two studies on Large Language Models (LLMs) and Automated Planning and Scheduling (APS), textttEliot generalizes literature-evolution analysis beyond hand-built taxonomies and domain-specific scripts. Given explicit query terms and filters, it retrieves arXiv papers at query time, represents each paper by title and abstract, clusters the corpus into themes, assigns representative keywords, and visualizes each cluster's publication-year distribution. We evaluate textttEliot as both an applied system and an interactive research aid. An offline configuration study across eight arXiv domains compares document representations, dimensionality reduction methods, and clustering algorithms using intrinsic clustering and topic-coherence metrics; the results support MiniLM embeddings with 10-dimensional UMAP and Agglomerative Clustering as a practical default. A scenario-based survey and expert focus group assess interpretability and use contexts: participants rated cluster labels as meaningful in 85% of scenario responses, and feedback indicated that textttEliot is most valuable for auditable overviews of rapidly changing technical areas. These results suggest that query-time clustering and temporal inspection can complement search and generation tools by helping researchers inspect and refine the evidence behind literature trends.