# Anchor: Mitigating Artifact Drift in Agent Benchmark Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26321 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.26321/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12045/) (2024)
- [τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07982/) (2025)
- [Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16416/) (2025)
- [Establishing Best Practices for Building Rigorous Agentic Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02825/) (2025)
- [SWE-Bench+: Enhanced Coding Benchmark for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06992/) (2024)
- [AgentSynth: Scalable Task Generation for Generalist Computer-Use Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14205/) (2025)
- [UTBoost: Rigorous Evaluation of Coding Agents on SWE-Bench](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09289/) (2025)
- [Beyond Accuracy: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Evaluating Enterprise Agentic AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.14136/) (2025)
- [Continuous Benchmark Generation for Evaluating Enterprise-scale LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.10049/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [What Makes Good Agentic Data? An ACE Lens on Data Generation for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.27260/) (2026)
- [ChartBmkAgent: Harness-Governed Multi-Agent Construction of Chart QA Benchmarks from Sparse Error-Taxonomy Specifications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08106/) (2026)
- [WorkRover: Scaling Long-Horizon Cowork Agent Training Via Recursive Environment Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18067/) (2026)
- [Tev: Scaling Long-Horizon Agentic Environments with Dense Progress Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18868/) (2026)
- [Interlock: From Local Correctness to Task Completion in Long-Horizon Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19686/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

AI agents are beginning to complete valuable, long-horizon business operations tasks, but training and evaluation environments for enterprise work still struggle to balance realism, verifiability, and scale. Environment and task creation frequently suffers from a failure mode we call artifact drift: when instructions, environments, oracles, and verifiers are created by loosely coupled processes, they frequently disagree on what a task requires, producing environments that are unsolvable, reward-hackable, or inconsistent. We introduce Anchor, a task-generation pipeline that formalizes domain experts' specifications of business workflows into constraint optimization programs. From a single parametric specification, the pipeline jointly produces a natural-language instruction, environment configuration, solver-certified ground-truth solution, and state-based verifier. With Anchor, altering parameters yields new tasks with controlled difficulty and known optimal solutions, producing harness-agnostic environments whose rewards depend solely on end-state business correctness. We apply Anchor to produce ERP-Bench: a benchmark of 300 long-horizon tasks spanning procurement and manufacturing workflows in a production-grade ERP system. We find that generation parameters predict realized difficulty, and that frontier models satisfy explicit task constraints in 26.1% of trials but reach a fully optimal solution in only 17.4% of trials. Overall, we show that Anchor and ERP-Bench offer a concrete recipe for building auditable evaluation environments for economically valuable agent work. We release the task generator and ERP-Bench dataset at erpbench.ai
