# How Accurate are Video Quality Models for Diffusion-Based Video Super-Resolution?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25940 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25940/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Inverse problems and image restoration, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 21 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Inverse problems and image restoration](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/inverse-problems-and-image-restoration/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.05997/) (2021)
- [Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12396/) (2022)
- [Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17090/) (2023)
- [Panda-70M: Captioning 70M Videos with Multiple Cross-Modality Teachers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19479/) (2024)
- [Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.04894/) (2022)
- [FAST-VQA: Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessment with Fragment Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.02595/) (2022)
- [PieAPP: Perceptual Image-Error Assessment through Pairwise Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.02067/) (2018)
- [Upscale-A-Video: Temporal-Consistent Diffusion Model for Real-World Video Super-Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06640/) (2023)
- [Towards Practical Real-Time Neural Video Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.20762/) (2025)
- [Unified Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videos with Mixed Datasets Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.04263/) (2020)
- [SeedVR: Seeding Infinity in Diffusion Transformer Towards Generic Video Restoration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.01320/) (2025)
- [Neighbourhood Representative Sampling for Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05357/) (2022)
- [SeedVR2: One-Step Video Restoration via Diffusion Adversarial Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05301/) (2025)
- [Towards Explainable In-the-Wild Video Quality Assessment: A Database and a Language-Prompted Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12726/) (2023)
- [ColorVideoVDP: A visual difference predictor for image, video and display distortions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11485/) (2024)
- [DOVE: Efficient One-Step Diffusion Model for Real-World Video Super-Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16239/) (2025)
- [Deep Learning based Full-reference and No-reference Quality Assessment Models for Compressed UGC Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01111/) (2021)
- [A Survey of Deep Learning Video Super-Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03216/) (2025)
- [Subjective Visual Quality Assessment for High-Fidelity Learning-Based Image Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.06301/) (2025)
- [AIM 2024 Challenge on Video Super-Resolution Quality Assessment: Methods and Results](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04225/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [DISRQAD: Diffusion Image Super-Resolution Quality Assessment Dataset and Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.09077/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent video super-resolution (VSR) approaches use deep neural networks to enhance low-quality input videos and recover visual detail, with diffusion-based methods in particular showing promising results. In this paper, we investigate whether existing video quality models can be used to assess the performance of these diffusion-based VSR methods, by comparing model predictions with results from a subjective test. The study compares six upscaling methods (Lanczos, Rhea, SCST, DOVE, SeedVR2, Starlight Mini) applied to both compressed (AV1 and DCVC-RT) and uncompressed low-resolution videos considering the play-out on a UHD-1/4K screen. A range of full- and no-reference quality models are used to assess their applicability to this new type of quality degradation, focusing on within-sequence performance. The results highlight that CNN-based full-reference models, such as LPIPS, DISTS, and CVQA-FR show significantly higher correlation coefficients than both conventional full- as well as the tested no-reference models. Most overestimate the overly sharp results of SCST, with VMAF mainly failing due to spatial inconsistencies introduced by Starlight Mini. None of the tested video quality models reach sufficient accuracy so as to replace complementary subjective testing. The reference, degraded and upscaled videos, as well as the user ratings and model scores are made available with the paper at https://github.com/Telecommunication-Telemedia-Assessment/AVT-VQDB-UHD-1-VSR as open data.