# The Timing Dependencies of Trust: Speed, Accuracy, and cBCI Neuro-Decoupling in Human-AI Teams

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25868 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25868/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.06937/) (2023)
- ["Are You Really Sure?" Understanding the Effects of Human Self-Confidence Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09552/) (2024)
- [Understanding the Effects of Miscalibrated AI Confidence on User Trust, Reliance, and Decision Efficacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07632/) (2024)
- [The impact of incorrect social information on collective wisdom in human groups](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.06160/) (2020)
- [Enhanced or distorted wisdom of crowds? An agent-based model of opinion formation under social influence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.10423/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The speed and accuracy of an artificial teammate fundamentally alter the failure states of Human-AI integration. While high-speed AI interventions risk inducing reflexive blind compliance, delayed interventions can induce ambiguous cognitive conflict. This study investigates how the fundamental characteristics of an in-task AI assistant, Fast/Less-Accurate (FLA-AI) versus Slow/Accurate (SA-AI) impact the synergy of Collaborative Brain-Computer Interface (cBCI) teams in a Virtual Reality drone task. Seventeen operators completed continuous search tasks under high cognitive workload while their spatial covariance was mapped using a 2D Adaptive Riemannian Oracle. The results mathematically demonstrate that AI timing dictates the mechanism of team failure. Fast AI induced instant, blind compliance; human accuracy under deception collapsed to 50.2%, and pure behavioural teams (N=8) failed to scale beyond 74.1%. In contrast, Slow AI induced delayed cognitive conflict; humans hesitated (61.1% accuracy), but N=8 behavioural teams eventually recovered to 100.0%. Crucially, the Riemannian Oracle mathematically adapted to these states: it heavily restricted temporal windows (< 0.8s) to intercept fast reflexive compliance, while widening windows (> 1.2s) to capture delayed cognitive conflict. Integrating these isolated veridical signals via Hybrid Fusion successfully rescued the Fast AI team (+7.6% at N=8) and significantly accelerated the recovery of smaller Slow AI teams (+6.9% at N=4). These findings prove that cBCI synergy is heavily contingent on the temporal dynamics of trust, providing a critical framework for designing dynamically gated Human-AI systems.