# When Self-Belief Misleads: Active Label Acquisition for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25864 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25864/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 38 of its 54 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reinforcement learning for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reinforcement-learning-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [Phi-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08905/) (2024)
- [rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.04519/) (2025)
- [TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16084/) (2025)
- [Learning to Reason without External Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19590/) (2025)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15134/) (2025)
- [Reasoning Models Know When They're Right: Probing Hidden States for Self-Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05419/) (2025)
- [Right Question is Already Half the Answer: Fully Unsupervised LLM Reasoning Incentivization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05812/) (2025)
- [Between Underthinking and Overthinking: An Empirical Study of Reasoning Length and correctness in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00127/) (2025)
- [Maximizing Confidence Alone Improves Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22660/) (2025)
- [AceReason-Nemotron: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16400/) (2025)
- [Deep Active Learning over the Long Tail](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00941/) (2017)
- [Consistent Paths Lead to Truth: Self-Rewarding Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08745/) (2025)
- [Evolving Language Models without Labels: Majority Drives Selection, Novelty Promotes Variation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.15194/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Active Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09401/) (2024)
- [How Far Can Unsupervised RLVR Scale LLM Training?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08660/) (2026)
- [Co-rewarding: Stable Self-supervised RL for Eliciting Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.00410/) (2025)
- [Dual Active Learning for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02504/) (2024)
- [Efficient Process Reward Model Training via Active Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10559/) (2025)
- [RESTRAIN: From Spurious Votes to Signals -- Self-Driven RL with Self-Penalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.02172/) (2025)
- [Beyond Majority Voting: Towards Fine-grained and More Reliable Reward Signal for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.15146/) (2025)
- [CoVerRL: Breaking the Consensus Trap in Label-Free Reasoning via Generator-Verifier Co-Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.17775/) (2026)
- [Contextual Rollout Bandits for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08499/) (2026)
- [ResT: Reshaping Token-Level Policy Gradients for Tool-Use Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21826/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [When Not to Imitate: Boundary-Aware Skill Memory for Reliable Tool-Use LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.22339/) (2026)
- [When May a Model Replace the Experiment? Audits, Licenses, and the Price of Trust in Surrogate-Driven Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01378/) (2026)
- [TGRL: Temperature-Grouped Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Exploration in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33589/) (2026)
- [When Updating Stops Being Learning: Rethinking LLM Self-Evolution via learnable information gain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.36535/) (2026)
- [SAKI: Maximal-Coupling-Routed Teacher Supervision for On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.36601/) (2026)
- [Checking the Checkers: A Synthesis of Verifier Noise and Robustness in RLVR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17824/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements in reasoning capabilities empowered by Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR). Nonetheless, RLVR intrinsically relies on ground-truth labels for reward computation, the acquisition of which is often prohibitively expensive in real-world scenarios. While unsupervised RLVR paradigms attempt to circumvent this by training on pseudo-labels, they are notoriously susceptible to training collapse. Moreover, different samples often exhibit varying annotation values. In this paper, we propose Reinforcement Learning with Active Verifiable Rewards (RLAVR), which actively acquires ground-truth labels for a small set of selected samples and integrates them with pseudo-labels, thereby stabilizing training dynamics and improving performance under limited annotation budgets. To identify valuable samples, we propose the Corrective Advantage Gap (CAG) metric and analyze the sample-level supervision value. Building on this, we introduce Correction-Aware Reliability Estimation for RLAVR (CARE), which translates the oracle CAG criterion into a practical pre-query acquisition policy to substantially improve training stability. Extensive experiments across diverse domains, model families, and model scales demonstrate the effectiveness and generality of our approach. Our code is available at https://github.com/Lumina04/CARE.