# Benchmarking Pathology Foundation Models for Spatial Domain Understanding

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25764 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25764/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.08473/) (2018)
- [Artificial Intelligence for Digital and Computational Pathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06148/) (2023)
- [Phikon-v2, A large and public feature extractor for biomarker prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.09173/) (2024)
- [A Clinical Benchmark of Public Self-Supervised Pathology Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06508/) (2024)
- [Accelerating Data Processing and Benchmarking of AI Models for Pathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06750/) (2025)
- [Hibou: A Family of Foundational Vision Transformers for Pathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05074/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking foundation models as feature extractors for weakly-supervised computational pathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15823/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Pathology Foundation Model: Progress and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04045/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [CellPath-Bench: A Multidimensional Benchmark for Whole-Slide Cellular Representations in Pathology Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.21060/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Pathology foundation models (PFMs) have emerged as a core approach for learning transferable representations from whole slide images (WSIs), and they are typically benchmarked through downstream clinical endpoints. While such task level evaluations are indispensable, they offer limited insight into what the representations themselves encode, particularly whether PFM embeddings can distinguish meaningful tissue regions and capture their spatial relationships. We present SpaPath-Bench, a representation level benchmark designed to diagnose spatial representation capability in PFMs. SpaPath-Bench formulates spatial domain identification (SDI) on paired whole slide image and spatial transcriptomics (ST) data as a diagnostic task. It curates 42 public paired WSI and ST slides, enables large scale evaluation across 19 encoders and seven SDI methods, and measures partition quality using three complementary criteria: unsupervised spatial coherence, transcriptomics referenced agreement, and expert referenced agreement. Across 83K runs, SpaPath-Bench reveals that different pretraining paradigms capture distinct aspects of tissue spatial architecture, and it provides practical guidance for building the next generation of spatially aware computational pathology models. Code and data pipelines are publicly available at https://bokai-zhao.github.io/SpaPath-benchboard/.
