# SiST-GNN: Simultaneous Spatial-Temporal Message Passing for Dynamic Graph Representation Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25548 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25548/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02907/) (2016)
- [Graph Attention Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10903/) (2017)
- [Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02216/) (2017)
- [How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.00826/) (2018)
- [Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02428/) (2019)
- [Heterogeneous Graph Attention Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.07293/) (2019)
- [Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.10637/) (2020)
- [Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.07962/) (2020)
- [Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.01207/) (2019)
- [EvolveGCN: Evolving Graph Convolutional Networks for Dynamic Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10191/) (2019)
- [T-GCN: A Temporal Graph ConvolutionalNetwork for Traffic Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.05320/) (2018)
- [Structured Sequence Modeling with Graph Convolutional Recurrent Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.07659/) (2016)
- [Representation Learning for Dynamic Graphs: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11485/) (2019)
- [Inductive Representation Learning in Temporal Networks via Causal Anonymous Walks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.05974/) (2021)
- [Towards Better Dynamic Graph Learning: New Architecture and Unified Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13047/) (2023)
- [Do We Really Need Complicated Model Architectures For Temporal Networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.11636/) (2023)
- [Temporal Graph Benchmark for Machine Learning on Temporal Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01026/) (2023)
- [ROLAND: Graph Learning Framework for Dynamic Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.07239/) (2022)
- [Towards Better Evaluation for Dynamic Link Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.10128/) (2022)
- [DynGEM: Deep Embedding Method for Dynamic Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.11273/) (2018)
- [dyngraph2vec: Capturing Network Dynamics using Dynamic Graph Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02657/) (2018)
- [Variational Graph Recurrent Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09710/) (2019)
- [APAN: Asynchronous Propagation Attention Network for Real-time Temporal Graph Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.11545/) (2020)
- [Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.03697/) (2018)
- [TCL: Transformer-based Dynamic Graph Modelling via Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07944/) (2021)
- [TREND: TempoRal Event and Node Dynamics for Graph Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14303/) (2022)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Dynamic Graph Neural Networks: Models, Frameworks, Benchmarks, Experiments and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00476/) (2024)
- [Decoupled Graph Neural Networks for Large Dynamic Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08273/) (2023)
- [Node-Time Conditional Prompt Learning In Dynamic Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13937/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Dynamic graph neural networks (DGNNs) that operate on snapshot sequences typically fall into one of two categories. Temporal-first approaches build per-node temporal embeddings and only afterward perform spatial aggregation, whereas Spatial-first approaches invert this order, feeding the output of a graph convolution into a downstream temporal module. In either case, the rigid sequencing forces the second stage to consume an already-compressed summary produced by the first, ruling out joint reasoning over topology and evolution; effectively, the message-passing operator never gets to weight a neighbor's contribution by that neighbor's past trajectory. This paper introduces SiST-GNN (Simultaneous Spatial-Temporal GNN), which fuses the two signals inside a single message-passing operation rather than chaining them. At each snapshot, we maintain a recurrent hidden state per node that summarises its history, pairs it with the node's current feature vector, and treats the pair as two nodes joined by a cross-time edge; running a standard graph convolution on this temporally augmented graph yields the updated representation. We compare against fourteen link-prediction baselines under both the fixed-split and live-update evaluation regimes, and eleven baselines on node classification. Across the public benchmarks, SiST-GNN improves on the strongest prior method in link prediction by 1-18% in the fixed-split setting, and is the leading learned method on five of six datasets in the live-update setting, improving on the strongest prior method by 1-158% there. We additionally derive three dynamic node-classification tasks by discretizing the underlying continuous-time event streams; here SiST-GNN beats the leading discrete-time (DTDG) baseline by 7-23% and matches continuous-time (CTDG) methods that consume the raw events directly.