# MATO: Multi-objective Personalized Alignment with Test-time Optimization for Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25342 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25342/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 33 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [LLM preference optimization methods](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/llm-preference-optimization-methods/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00515/) (2024)
- [Personal LLM Agents: Insights and Survey about the Capability, Efficiency and Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05459/) (2024)
- [The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.01552/) (2023)
- [Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04488/) (2023)
- [From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12358/) (2024)
- [Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10207/) (2024)
- [Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.10075/) (2024)
- [Do LLMs Recognize Your Preferences? Evaluating Personalized Preference Following in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09597/) (2025)
- [Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03708/) (2023)
- [Personalization of Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00027/) (2024)
- [Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02416/) (2024)
- [Decoding-Time Language Model Alignment with Multiple Objectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18853/) (2024)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning for Multi-objective Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02386/) (2019)
- [When Large Language Models Meet Personalization: Perspectives of Challenges and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16376/) (2023)
- [Aligning to Thousands of Preferences via System Message Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17977/) (2024)
- [Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02030/) (2024)
- [Decoding-time Realignment of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02992/) (2024)
- [PAD: Personalized Alignment of LLMs at Decoding-Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04070/) (2024)
- [GenARM: Reward Guided Generation with Autoregressive Reward Model for Test-time Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08193/) (2024)
- [MetaAligner: Towards Generalizable Multi-Objective Alignment of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17141/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Personalized Alignment -- The Missing Piece for Large Language Models in Real-World Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17003/) (2025)
- [Amulet: ReAlignment During Test Time for Personalized Preference Adaptation of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19148/) (2025)
- [PARM: Multi-Objective Test-Time Alignment via Preference-Aware Autoregressive Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.06274/) (2025)
- [Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11458/) (2024)
- [One-Shot Safety Alignment for Large Language Models via Optimal Dualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19544/) (2024)
- [Context Steering: Controllable Personalization at Inference Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01768/) (2024)
- [The Max-Min Formulation of Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning: From Theory to a Model-Free Algorithm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07826/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with diverse and multifaceted user preferences is a fundamental challenge in personalized AI systems. Existing multi-objective alignment methods either rely on costly training or require pre-trained reward models for each preference, making it difficult for them to adapt to evolving preferences. Prompt-based personalization offers a training-free alternative, but prompting alone often provides limited steerability, as LLMs may overemphasize or overlook certain preferences and fail to give users reliable control over the relative importance of different objectives when conflicts arise, leading to suboptimal alignment. In this paper, we introduce MATO, a training-free framework for Multi-objective personalized Alignment with Test-time Optimization. MATO formulates personalization as a test-time optimization problem that steers the relative importance of multiple objectives through controllable weights during decoding, without modifying model parameters or requiring external reward models. Specifically, a reward discovery module recovers preference rewards directly from the backbone LLM for diverse objectives specified in natural language, while a weight optimization module dynamically adjusts objective weights based on the user's initial preferences and the partially generated response to balance competing objectives during generation. The resulting rewards and weights jointly guide an online optimization procedure over the token distribution, enabling better alignment with the target objectives. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets and backbone LLMs show that MATO consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving Pareto-improving multi-objective alignment and stronger steerability. These results highlight test-time optimization as a promising direction for scalable, controllable, and model-agnostic personalized alignment.