# They Are Not the Same: Direct Causes Are Not Grounded Emotion Explanations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25208 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25208/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [WavLM: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Full Stack Speech Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.13900/) (2021)
- [Emotion-Cause Pair Extraction: A New Task to Emotion Analysis in Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01267/) (2019)
- [Recognizing Emotion Cause in Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.11820/) (2020)
- [Dimensional Modeling of Emotions in Text with Appraisal Theories: Corpus Creation, Annotation Reliability, and Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05238/) (2022)
- [Revisiting Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversation from the Perspective of Graph Spectrum](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.17862/) (2024)
- [Multimodal Emotion-Cause Pair Extraction in Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08020/) (2021)
- [Conversation Understanding using Relational Temporal Graph Neural Networks with Auxiliary Cross-Modality Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04507/) (2023)
- [Position Bias Mitigation: A Knowledge-Aware Graph Model for Emotion Cause Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03518/) (2021)
- [Knowledge-Bridged Causal Interaction Network for Causal Emotion Entailment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.02995/) (2022)
- [SemEval-2024 Task 3: Multimodal Emotion Cause Analysis in Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13049/) (2024)
- [M3HG: Multimodal, Multi-scale, and Multi-type Node Heterogeneous Graph for Emotion Cause Triplet Extraction in Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18740/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Emotion-Cause Pair Extraction (ECPE) was introduced to explain why an emotion occurs, but this goal is now often reduced to binary pair/non-pair prediction. This proxy is useful for direct-cause extraction, yet easy to over-read as evidence grounded emotion explanation. We show that this interpretation is only partially valid. In IEMO-MECP, 90.9% of original positives remain emo-cause and 95.0% of original negatives remain non-pair, confirming that the binary ECPE task is largely preserved. The problem is that direct triggers alone do not constitute a grounded explanation. Emo-context, an utterance that helps interpret a target emotion without directly causing it, appears on both sides of the original boundary and is enriched near binary uncertainty, showing that the binary boundary has no stable place for such discourse evidence. Across evaluated ECPE models, direct triggers are recovered more reliably than contextual support. Under shortcut pressure, this imbalance becomes consequential. Binary-trained models assign higher pair scores to nearby lexically similar non-pair candidates than to evidence supported but structurally harder emo-cause and emo-context pairs. Thus, pair scores can reward convenient attributions over grounded explanations. High binary ECPE performance indicates that a model can identify direct triggers; it does not indicate that the model has explained the emotion. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/panzhzh/ECPExsame.