# Preisach Attention: A Hysteretic Model of Sequential Memory

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23603 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23603/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00752/) (2023)
- [Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.06538/) (2017)
- [Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05150/) (2020)
- [Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14062/) (2020)
- [RWKV: Reinventing RNNs for the Transformer Era](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13048/) (2023)
- [Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07677/) (2022)
- [What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15661/) (2022)
- [Titans: Learning to Memorize at Test Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00663/) (2024)
- [Theoretical Limitations of Self-Attention in Neural Sequence Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.06755/) (2019)
- [Ising formulations of many NP problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1302.5843/) (2013)
- [The Parallelism Tradeoff: Limitations of Log-Precision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00729/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce the Preisach Attention Layer (PAL), a novel sequence modelling architecture grounded in the classical Preisach hysteresis operator from mathematical physics. PAL replaces the softmax attention mechanism with a binary relay operator parameterised by learned activation and deactivation thresholds, maintaining a stack of local extrema as its internal state. A single-layer PAL-Transformer with O(1) depth is Turing-complete under arbitrary precision arithmetic, achievable through simulation of a two-stack pushdown automaton -- in contrast to the O(log n) depth required by standard hard-attention transformers. Second, we prove that the function classes computable by PAL and by the transformer are incomparable: PAL computes historical range statistics in O(1) layers that require O(log n) layers for transformers, while transformers support random-access retrieval that PAL cannot perform without auxiliary state. The separating property is rate-independence -- PAL responds only to the sequence of local extrema, not to absolute token positions or temporal spacing. Third, we show that the extremum stack constitutes a minimal sufficient statistic of the input history for all rate-independent functionals, providing a formal analogue of the wiping property in classical hysteresis theory. PAL is thus an efficient architecture for tasks with long episodic memory and weak positional dependence, with O(n log n) total inference cost versus O(n^2) for standard attention.