# Query-Adaptive Semantic Chunking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Dynamic Strategy with Contextual Window Expansion

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22834 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.22834/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 7 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [Multimodal RAG](https://mlsanity.com/rag/multimodal-rag/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08909/) (2020)
- [Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01282/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00093/) (2023)
- [Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10496/) (2022)
- [Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15217/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems depend critically on document chunking quality for retrieving relevant context. Fixed chunking segments documents into uniform units irrespective of semantics or user intent, producing a precision-recall trade-off unresolvable by tuning chunk size alone. Semantic and agentic methods partially address these limitations but do not integrate user queries at the chunking stage. We present Query-Adaptive Semantic Chunking (QASC), which dynamically constructs chunks by integrating queries into segmentation through three mechanisms: cosine similarity scoring between sentence and query embeddings to identify seed sentences, contextual window expansion around seeds to preserve coherence, and chunk-level score aggregation to ensure holistic relevance. We evaluate QASC on 100 technical documents across 200 queries spanning four types, comparing against fixed chunking at five granularities, recursive splitting, semantic chunking, and agentic chunking. QASC achieves an F1-score of 0.85, a relative improvement of 18-27% over fixed chunking and 8-12% over semantic and agentic alternatives. Ablation studies confirm each component contributes meaningfully. Human evaluation by three annotators (Cohen kappa = 0.82) corroborates that QASC produces more relevant and coherent chunks than existing methods.