# Flat-Pack Bench: Evaluating Spatio-Temporal Understanding in Large Vision-Language Models through Furniture Assembly

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21625 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.21625/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 20 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Embodied and 3D vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/embodied-and-3d-vision-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [Video-LLaVA: Learning United Visual Representation by Alignment Before Projection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10122/) (2023)
- [MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17005/) (2023)
- [Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11805/) (2023)
- [Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14171/) (2024)
- [LLaVA-Video: Video Instruction Tuning With Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02713/) (2024)
- [Set-of-Mark Prompting Unleashes Extraordinary Visual Grounding in GPT-4V](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11441/) (2023)
- [Oryx MLLM: On-Demand Spatial-Temporal Understanding at Arbitrary Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12961/) (2024)
- [PerceptionLM: Open-Access Data and Models for Detailed Visual Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13180/) (2025)
- [Apollo: An Exploration of Video Understanding in Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10360/) (2024)
- [STI-Bench: Are MLLMs Ready for Precise Spatial-Temporal World Understanding?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23765/) (2025)
- [VideoRefer Suite: Advancing Spatial-Temporal Object Understanding with Video LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00599/) (2024)
- [LEGO-Puzzles: How Good Are MLLMs at Multi-Step Spatial Reasoning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19990/) (2025)
- [UrBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models in Multi-View Urban Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.17267/) (2024)
- [SAMA: Towards Multi-Turn Referential Grounded Video Chat with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18812/) (2025)
- [Strefer: Empowering Video LLMs with Space-Time Referring and Reasoning via Synthetic Instruction Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.03501/) (2025)
- [The Point, the Vision and the Text: Does Point Cloud Boost Spatial Reasoning of Large Language Models? A Bias-Controlled Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04540/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The emergence of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) has significantly advanced video understanding capabilities. However, existing benchmarks focus predominantly on coarse-grained tasks such as action segmentation, classification, captioning, and retrieval. Furthermore, these benchmarks often rely on entities that can be easily identified verbally, like household objects, animals, human subjects, etc., limiting their applicability to complex, in-the-wild video scenarios. But, many applications such as furniture assembly, cooking, etc., require step-by-step fine-grained spatio-temporal understanding of the video, which is not sufficiently evaluated in current benchmarks. To address this gap, we introduce Flat-Pack Bench, a novel benchmark centered on furniture assembly tasks. Our benchmark evaluates LVLMs on nuanced tasks, including temporal ordering of assembly actions, temporal localization of assembly state, understanding part mating, and tracking, using multiple-choice questions paired with visual prompts highlighting relevant parts as references for fine-grained questions. Our experiments reveal that state-of-the-art LVLMs struggle significantly with fine-grained spatio-temporal reasoning, highlighting their limitations in effectively leveraging temporal information from videos, limited tracking ability, and understanding of spatial interactions like physical contact.