# Reducing Object Hallucination in LVLMs via Emphasizing Image-negative Tokens

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21300 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.21300/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 21 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/hallucination-mitigation-in-lvlms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10355/) (2023)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.05973/) (2023)
- [Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06209/) (2024)
- [Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14525/) (2023)
- [PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.07726/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16922/) (2023)
- [Object Hallucination in Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02156/) (2018)
- [OPERA: Alleviating Hallucination in Multi-Modal Large Language Models via Over-Trust Penalty and Retrospection-Allocation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17911/) (2023)
- [Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14565/) (2023)
- [Analyzing and Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00754/) (2023)
- [Multi-Modal Hallucination Control by Visual Information Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14003/) (2024)
- [SVIT: Scaling up Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04087/) (2023)
- [Efficient Multimodal Learning from Data-centric Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11530/) (2024)
- [From CLIP to DINO: Visual Encoders Shout in Multi-modal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08825/) (2023)
- [Detecting and Evaluating Medical Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10185/) (2024)
- [Visual Perturbation-aware Collaborative Learning for Overcoming the Language Prior Problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.11850/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Object hallucination is a significant challenge that hinders the application of large vision-language models (LVLMs) in practice. We hypothesize that one possible origin of hallucination is the model's tendency to prioritize text generation over meaningful interaction with images. To explore this, we examine the generation process and categorize text tokens into three groups: image-positive, invariant, and negative, based on their visual dependence on input image tokens. Our analysis reveals that most generated tokens are minimally influenced by the image information. This suggests that during the model's training stage, more emphasis is placed on learning how to follow textual instructions, rather than extracting information from images. Based on this finding, we propose adjusting the training weights of different tokens depending on their visual dependence to control hallucination. Additionally, we remove a portion of the training data that potentially contains more hallucinations as a data filtering strategy. Both methods achieve a reduction in hallucination without compromising response length or introducing additional computational costs during inference. We validate our methods across three LVLM variants, demonstrating the effectiveness and general applicability.