# HalluCXR: Benchmarking and Mitigating Hallucinations in Medical Vision-Language Models for Chest Radiograph Interpretation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20469 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.20469/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 8 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/hallucination-mitigation-in-lvlms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05271/) (2024)
- [The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17421/) (2023)
- [BiomedCLIP: a multimodal biomedical foundation model pretrained from fifteen million scientific image-text pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.00915/) (2023)
- [Towards Generalist Foundation Model for Radiology by Leveraging Web-scale 2D&3D Medical Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02463/) (2023)
- [A Vision-Language Foundation Model to Enhance Efficiency of Chest X-ray Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12208/) (2024)
- [Detecting and Evaluating Medical Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10185/) (2024)
- [MedVH: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Hallucination for Large Vision Language Models in the Medical Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02730/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used for medical image interpretation, yet they frequently hallucinate, generating clinically plausible but factually incorrect findings that pose direct patient safety risks. We introduce HalluCXR, a benchmark evaluating six architecturally diverse VLMs across 856 stratified MIMIC-CXR chest radiographs and three query types, yielding 15,408 model evaluations. An eight-category hallucination taxonomy with clinical severity ratings and a two-layer detection pipeline are validated against 250 human annotations (auto-detection F1=0.959; LLM judge F1=0.907). We find that 61.9--82.3% of outputs contain hallucinations, with clinically dangerous errors in up to 80.2%. Three key patterns emerge: normal radiographs paradoxically attract the most severe hallucinations, common findings are systematically over-fabricated while rare findings go under-detected, and response length alone predicts hallucination risk (AUC up to 0.908). A six-model ensemble reduces fabrication by up to 84.8% at the cost of increased omission; a three-model subset retains comparable performance at half the cost. These results establish that hallucination auditing, verbosity-based risk monitoring, and ensemble-based safety layers are prerequisites for clinical deployment.