# MedicalBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Toward Improved Medical Concept Extraction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20197 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.20197/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14508/) (2023)
- [Explainable Prediction of Medical Codes from Clinical Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.05695/) (2018)
- [Long-Context LLMs Meet RAG: Overcoming Challenges for Long Inputs in RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05983/) (2024)
- [Does the Magic of BERT Apply to Medical Code Assignment? A Quantitative Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06511/) (2021)
- [MDACE: MIMIC Documents Annotated with Code Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03859/) (2023)
- [CORAL: Expert-Curated medical Oncology Reports to Advance Language Model Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03853/) (2023)
- [Integrating Physiological Time Series and Clinical Notes with Deep Learning for Improved ICU Mortality Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.11059/) (2020)
- [Automated ICD Coding using Extreme Multi-label Long Text Transformer-based Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.05857/) (2022)
- [Event-based clinical findings extraction from radiology reports with pre-trained language model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.13512/) (2021)
- [Entity Anchored ICD Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.07444/) (2022)
- [The Anatomy of Evidence: An Investigation Into Explainable ICD Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01802/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Medical concept extraction from electronic health records underpins many downstream applications, yet remains challenging because medically meaningful concepts are frequently implied rather than explicitly stated in medical narratives. Existing benchmarks with human-annotated evidence spans underscore the importance of grounding extracted concepts in medical text. However, they predominantly focus on explicitly stated concepts instead of implicit concepts. We present MedicalBench, a benchmark for medical concept extraction with evidence grounding that evaluates implicit medical reasoning. MedicalBench formulates medical concept extraction as a verification task over medical note-concept pairs, coupled with sentence-level evidence identification. Built from MIMIC-IV discharge summaries and human-verified ICD-10 codes, the dataset is curated through a multi-stage large language model (LLM) triage pipeline followed by medical annotation and expert review. It deliberately includes implicit positives, semantically confusable negatives, and cases where LLM judgments disagree with medical expert assessments. We define two complementary evaluation tasks: (1) medical concept extraction and (2) sentence-level evidence retrieval, enabling assessment of both correctness and interpretability. Benchmarking state-of-the-art LLMs reveals that performance remains modest, highlighting the difficulty of extracting implicitly expressed concepts. We further show that performance is largely invariant to note length, indicating that MedicalBench isolates reasoning difficulty rather than superficial confounders. MedicalBench provides the first systematic benchmark for implicit, evidence-grounded medical concept extraction, offering a foundation for developing medical language models that can both identify medically relevant concepts and justify their predictions in a transparent and medically faithful manner.
