# Beyond Prediction Accuracy: Target-Space Recovery Profiles for Evaluating Model-Brain Alignment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20127 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.20127/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14294/) (2021)
- [A ConvNet for the 2020s](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.03545/) (2022)
- [Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15343/) (2023)
- [Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00414/) (2019)
- [DINOv3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10104/) (2025)
- [SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14786/) (2025)
- [Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13181/) (2025)
- [Data Filtering Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17425/) (2023)
- [Deep Neural Networks Reveal a Gradient in the Complexity of Neural Representations across the Brain's Ventral Visual Pathway](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.6422/) (2014)
- [Toward Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence: Catalyzing the NeuroAI Revolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08340/) (2022)
- [A Spectral Theory of Neural Prediction and Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12821/) (2023)
- [Brain-Model Evaluations Need the NeuroAI Turing Test](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.16238/) (2025)
- [A 7T fMRI dataset of synthetic images for out-of-distribution modeling of vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06286/) (2025)
- [Only Brains Align with Brains: Cross-Region Alignment Patterns Expose Limits of Normative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21780/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial vision models are often evaluated against the human visual cortex by measuring how accurately their internal representations predict brain responses. However, prediction accuracy alone does not indicate which dimensions of the target brain's response space are recovered. Here, we introduce a unified framework for evaluating both model-brain and brain-brain alignment by identifying the response dimensions recovered by prediction. Using repeated fMRI measurements, we first identify target-brain response dimensions that can be reproducibly predicted across independent trial splits. We then predict target-brain responses from either another subject's brain responses or a vision model's internal representations, and quantify how strongly each of these reproducible response dimensions is recovered. Applying this framework to a subset of the Natural Scenes Dataset, in which eight subjects viewed the same natural images during fMRI, we find that the early-to-intermediate visual-cortex responses contain a low-dimensional set of reproducible dimensions. Brain-to-brain comparisons identify which of these dimensions are consistently recoverable from other subjects' brains, providing a diagnostic human reference rather than only a scalar benchmark. In some cases, pretrained and randomly initialized models achieve similar prediction accuracy while showing distinct recovery profiles across these response dimensions. These results show that prediction accuracy alone can mask model-brain mismatches. By making explicit which reproducible brain response dimensions are recovered by prediction, our framework provides a more diagnostic evaluation of alignment between artificial vision models and the human visual cortex.