# What Are LLMs Doing to Scientific Communication? Measuring Changes in Writing Practices and Reading Experience

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19936 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19936/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.3781/) (2013)
- [BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05794/) (2022)
- [Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13663/) (2024)
- [How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07597/) (2023)
- [CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.06796/) (2022)
- [RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07940/) (2024)
- [MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13242/) (2023)
- [Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07016/) (2024)
- [Survey of Computational Approaches to Lexical Semantic Change](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.06278/) (2018)
- [Contrasting Linguistic Patterns in Human and LLM-Generated News Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09067/) (2023)
- [Do LLMs write like humans? Variation in grammatical and rhetorical styles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16107/) (2024)
- [People who frequently use ChatGPT for writing tasks are accurate and robust detectors of AI-generated text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15654/) (2025)
- [Token Prediction as Implicit Classification to Identify LLM-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08723/) (2023)
- [AI vs. Human -- Differentiation Analysis of Scientific Content Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10416/) (2023)
- [HACo-Det: A Study Towards Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection under Human-AI Coauthoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02959/) (2025)
- [Comparing LLM-generated and human-authored news text using formal syntactic theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01407/) (2025)
- [Divergent LLM Adoption and Heterogeneous Convergence Paths in Research Writing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13629/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Has the style of scientific communication changed due to the growing use of large language models in the writing process? We address this question in the domain of Natural Language Processing by leveraging two data resources we create: a naturalistic corpus of over 37,000 papers from the ACL Anthology (2020-2024); and a synthetic dataset of 3,000 human-written passages and their LLM-generated improvements. We first implement a series of diachronic lexical analyses, showing that both word frequency and usage contexts have changed significantly over time, indicating semantic specialization in some cases and generalization in others. Broadening our perspective, we then model a range of more complex stylistic features and find that LLM-modified texts more frequently contain certain syntactic constructions, more complex and longer words and a lower lexical diversity. Finally, we connect these changes in writing practices to subjective reading experience through a pilot annotation study with 20 domain experts. They overall rate LLM-improved texts as more understandable and exciting, but also express negative qualitative attitudes towards LLMs, highlighting the strongly subjective effect of AI-assisted writing on reading experience.