# DocQT: Improving Document Forgery Localization Robustness via Diverse JPEG Quantization Tables

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19688 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19688/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [FUNSD: A Dataset for Form Understanding in Noisy Scanned Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13538/) (2019)
- [PSCC-Net: Progressive Spatio-Channel Correlation Network for Image Manipulation Detection and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10596/) (2021)
- [TruFor: Leveraging all-round clues for trustworthy image forgery detection and localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10957/) (2022)
- [Learning JPEG Compression Artifacts for Image Manipulation Detection and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.12947/) (2021)
- [IMDL-BenCo: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Codebase for Image Manipulation Detection & Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10580/) (2024)
- [Mesoscopic Insights: Orchestrating Multi-scale & Hybrid Architecture for Image Manipulation Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13753/) (2024)
- [ForensicHub: A Unified Benchmark & Codebase for All-Domain Fake Image Detection and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11003/) (2025)
- [Toward Real Text Manipulation Detection: New Dataset and New Solution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06934/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Document manipulation localization models achieve strong performance on public benchmarks yet fail to generalize to operational document workflows. We identify a critical and overlooked source of this gap: the mismatch between the narrow distribution of JPEG quantization tables used during training -restricted to standard libjpeg quality factors -and the heterogeneous compression profiles encountered in real-world insurance document pipelines. To isolate this factor, we conduct a controlled factorial study comparing two architectures with contrasting levels of quantization table awareness -FFDN [2] and Mesorch [20] -each trained under either standard quality factor augmentation (Standard-QT ) or operationally calibrated quantization tables sampled from DocQT, a quantization-table bank derived from a MAIF operational image corpus (Real-QT ), and evaluated under three recompression conditions. Training under Real-QT yields substantial localization gains on DocTamper [15] and significantly reduces the pixel-level false positive rate on authentic operational documents, but only for architectures that explicitly ingest the quantization table as input. The released DocQT quantization-table dataset and compression-reproduction material are directly available at https://github.com/Kyliroco/Improving-Document-Forgery-Localization-Robustness-via-Diverse-JPEG-Quantization-Tables. These results demonstrate that standard quality factor augmentation does not adequately proxy operational compression diversity, and that architectural choices explicitly conditioning on the quantization table provide a meaningful robustness advantage for real-world deployment.