# POLAR-Bench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Privacy-Utility Trade-offs in LLM Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19127 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19127/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 27 of its 86 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [Deep Learning with Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.00133/) (2016)
- [Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07805/) (2020)
- [MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01574/) (2024)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07911/) (2023)
- [Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09527/) (2022)
- [Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17884/) (2023)
- [Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07298/) (2023)
- [PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.00138/) (2024)
- [AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.05175/) (2024)
- [AgentDAM: Privacy Leakage Evaluation for Autonomous Web Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09780/) (2025)
- [PAPILLON: Privacy Preservation from Internet-based and Local Language Model Ensembles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17127/) (2024)
- [Is My Data in Your Retrieval Database? Membership Inference Attacks Against Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20446/) (2024)
- [LLM-PBE: Assessing Data Privacy in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.12787/) (2024)
- [PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04044/) (2023)
- [Privacy in Action: Towards Realistic Privacy Mitigation and Evaluation for LLM-Powered Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17488/) (2025)
- [1-2-3 Check: Enhancing Contextual Privacy in LLM via Multi-Agent Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.07667/) (2025)
- [Prompt Injection as Role Confusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.12277/) (2026)
- [CI-Work: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity in Enterprise LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21308/) (2026)
- [Towards Benchmarking Privacy Vulnerabilities in Selective Forgetting with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.18035/) (2025)
- [Privacy Evaluation Benchmarks for NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.15868/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [SovereignNegotiation-Bench: Evaluating User-Owned Personal Agents In Delegated Bargaining Under Privacy, Consent, Evidence, And Institutional Pressure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02814/) (2026)
- [Selection-Invariant Communication Compilers for Privacy-Aware Multi-Agent LLM Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.26076/) (2026)
- [MNC: Scope-Bound Semantic Declassification for Private LLM-Agent Communication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01719/) (2026)
- [CoSec: Benchmarking Agent Security in Communities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34790/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

LLM agents increasingly have access to private user data and act on the user's behalf when interacting with third-party systems. The user defines what may and must not be shared, and the agent must robustly follow that intent even when third-party systems behave adversarially. We introduce POLAR-Bench (Policy-aware adversarial Benchmark), in which a trusted model with a privacy policy and a task converses with a third-party model that adversarially probes for both task-relevant and protected attributes. Across 10 domains and 7,852 samples, we score privacy and utility by deterministic set-membership and vary privacy policy dimension and attack strategy along two orthogonal axes, producing a 5 times 5 diagnostic surface per model. Our results reveal a sharp split: current frontier models withhold over 99% of protected attributes, while smaller open-weight models in the 1--30B range, the class users most commonly run as their own trusted agent on-device or via private inference, score notably worse, with the weakest leaking over half. POLAR-Bench thus localizes where each model's intent-following breaks down, providing a foothold for privacy alignment where it matters most.