# FAGER: Factually Grounded Evaluation and Refinement of Text-to-Image Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19111 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19111/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08718/) (2021)
- [FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15742/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01291/) (2024)
- [TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11897/) (2023)
- [ABO: Dataset and Benchmarks for Real-World 3D Object Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06199/) (2021)
- [DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04053/) (2022)
- [GenAI-Bench: Evaluating and Improving Compositional Text-to-Visual Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13743/) (2024)
- [What You See is What You Read? Improving Text-Image Alignment Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10400/) (2023)
- [GenEval 2: Addressing Benchmark Drift in Text-to-Image Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.16853/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Image Hallucination in Text-to-Image Generation with Question-Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12784/) (2024)
- [T2I-FactualBench: Benchmarking the Factuality of Text-to-Image Models with Knowledge-Intensive Concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04300/) (2024)
- [FineGRAIN: Evaluating Failure Modes of Text-to-Image Models with Vision Language Model Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02161/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [EviScene: Beyond "Is It AI?" for Agentic Image Factuality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14609/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Existing text-to-image (T2I) evaluation metrics mainly assess whether generated images align with information explicitly stated in the prompt, but often fail to capture factual requirements that are implicit, externally grounded, or identity-defining. As a result, they are not well suited for evaluating factual correctness in prompts involving scientific knowledge, historical facts, products, or culture-specific concepts. We propose FActually Grounded Evaluation and Refinement (FAGER), an agentic framework that evaluates whether generated images correctly reflect visually verifiable facts grounded in or implied by the prompt, while also providing actionable feedback for improvement. FAGER first constructs a structured factual rubric by combining LLM-based fact proposal with reference-guided visual fact extraction and verification, then converts the rubric into question-answer pairs for VLM-based evaluation. To validate FAGER as a factuality metric, we introduce a Factual A/B test, which measures whether a metric prefers factual reference images over corresponding generated images. Across five datasets spanning science, history, products, culture, and knowledge-intensive concepts, FAGER consistently outperforms prior metrics on this test. We further show that FAGER can be used to refine T2I outputs in a fully training-free manner, yielding substantial factuality gains across datasets.